[bots]

The problem is that being rich and healthy with all the comforts is no use without health. Get a painful incurable disease and you are in hell no matter what your circumstances are.

I admire humans wish to make everything better for everyone, but we are animals and as such we don't play fair. We want whats best for us and our loved ones above all others. That will never change.

Over population, under population makes no difference because basic instincts will always be the same

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The problem is that being rich and healthy with all the comforts is no use without health. Get a painful incurable disease and you are in hell no matter what your circumstances are.

I admire humans wish to make everything better for everyone, but we are animals and as such we don't play fair. We want whats best for us and our loved ones above all others. That will never change.

Over population, under population makes no difference because basic instincts will always be the same

You're probably right unless we go through some sort of mindfulness evolution

[bots]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

You're probably right unless we go through some sort of mindfulness evolution

i saw an article recently where they showed that dogs have been forced bred favouring those that can control their eye muscles to look cute to humans .... we need the same sort of thing to weed out the heartless bastards from the population

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i saw an article recently where they showed that dogs have been forced bred favouring those that can control their eye muscles to look cute to humans .... we need the same sort of thing to weed out the heartless bastards from the population

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Well that's just it though, and the primary instincts are all based around survival. It turns out, the biggest asset in adaptability and survival is intelligence, by far. Humans got too smart, and therefore "too good at surviving" and because of the inevitable population boom we're quickly outgrowing our habitat (Earth) and have nowhere to expand to, so (unless there's a sudden leap in space travel technology and terraforming) we'll use up everything that this one has to offer for as long as is possible and then simply die off.

We are victims of our own success.

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i saw an article recently where they showed that dogs have been forced bred favouring those that can control their eye muscles to look cute to humans .... we need the same sort of thing to weed out the heartless bastards from the population

I'd be happy to chip in for that particular research.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The problem is that being rich and healthy with all the comforts is no use without health. Get a painful incurable disease and you are in hell no matter what your circumstances are.

I admire humans wish to make everything better for everyone, but we are animals and as such we don't play fair. We want whats best for us and our loved ones above all others. That will never change.

Over population, under population makes no difference because basic instincts will always be the same

Well that's just it though, and the primary instincts are all based around survival. It turns out, the biggest asset in adaptability and survival is intelligence, by far. Humans got too smart, and therefore "too good at surviving" and because of the inevitable population boom we're quickly outgrowing our habitat (Earth) and have nowhere to expand to, so (unless there's a sudden leap in space travel technology and terraforming) we'll use up everything that this one has to offer for as long as is possible and then simply die off.