[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I’m trying to find an article which is easier to understand with this because the wording../..grammar etc seems a bit weird...I can’t really find a site which I’m familiar with though...I tried to follow a link to the EADT but that led me to some dodgy stuff.....

...anyways I just don’t understand a legitimate article being written in such a way as this seems to be...

‘The pinnacle acknowledged they had been extra handy nevertheless some fogeys and pupils are upset’

‘Eleven-300 and sixty five days-historical pupils in 300 and sixty five days Seven – each ladies and boys’

‘This uniform replaces the regular uniform of skirts, sad pullovers or cardigan previously frail by pupils.’

‘One dad or mum who wished to stay nameless told local press: ‘If this truly ideal about glass facet stairs then how advance feminine workers are soundless carrying skirts? No-one believes this nonsense.’


...it might just be an off day but I think I’ll wait to see what other sites run this story...

what? none of that comes up on the link for me


here's the Daily Mail link

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...t-modesty.html

Its was also discussing on Sunday Politics