| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
That's the inherent strawman of this entire debate all across the internet though; the false claim that anyone who doesn't like or takes issue with the song/lyrics either thinks women don't enjoy sex, or that they shouldn't enjoy sex, or that they shouldn't express an enjoyment of sex. When of course, obviously, very few people are actually saying that but hey it's easier to pretend than to actually discuss the criticisms that are raised, I suppose.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
Personally I clearly reacted to your 'new misogyny' comparison and the comparisons to porn made by Russell Brand.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
Quote:
.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
I took it to mean they were uncomfortable that it couldn't be pigeon holed as easy as some. So they render it tittilation or new misogyny.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|