[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Probably because its the Daily Mail and their commenters have significantly impaired reading comprehension;

"According to an Invictus spokesperson, the event was 'shelved' due to the Covid-19 pandemic and was a decision independent of the Netflix deal being signed.

The event was shelved because the primary revenue generator was ticket sales from a live concert in Los Angeles in the spring of 2021.

'Given current circumstances with Covid, the event needed to be reconceptualised.

'This was an independent decision made prior to a partnership with Netflix. The duke remains committed as ever to the Invictus Games.'

The 2020 Invictus Games which was due to be held in April were called off because of the coronavirus pandemic."


Perhaps you also skipped half the article and went straight to the toxic chav comments, LT?

Very insulting TS, given the first half of the article is centred around -

According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a 'conflict' of plans with another streaming service.

Which I read elsewhere as the reason, and the conflict was with Amazon.

The next half cites coronavirus, according to an Invictus spokesperson, as the reason.
So we don't know for sure which is correct.

How come you skipped the first half? Reading comprehension problem?