Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-02-2021, 11:29 AM #1
Candy Annie Cane's Avatar
Candy Annie Cane Candy Annie Cane is offline
AnnieK
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 15,881


Candy Annie Cane Candy Annie Cane is offline
AnnieK
Candy Annie Cane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 15,881


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
Her father felt his privacy had been invaded by Meghan showing the letter to her friends and People magazine then printing what the friends told them was in the letter, apparently with Meghan’s blessing. Meghan took no exception at this publication as it showed her in a good light and him bad. Unlike Meghan he hadn’t the deep pockets, if needed, to sue People even if he had wanted to.

The defense of how he was portrayed in the People mag was the reason her father showed the letter to the paper in the first place who then printed extracts and led to them being sued by Meghan.
I’m referring to the human side of things here, not just points of law. I see unfairness and hypocrisy in this.
The human side is pretty murky I will agree. However, so was him selling photographs before the wedding. There is fault on both sides but it seems that only Meghan receives the derision from lots of people
__________________
Candy Annie Cane is offline  
Old 12-02-2021, 11:55 AM #2
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnieK View Post
The human side is pretty murky I will agree. However, so was him selling photographs before the wedding. There is fault on both sides but it seems that only Meghan receives the derision from lots of people
That's because she is the one who is the instigator of trouble….its a recurring theme...
If she hadn’t point blank refused Palace aids “who were tearing their hair out” advice to let them help and advise her father after the engagement news broke, those photos wouldn’t have been taken.

The paps were all over him for months after that, day after day. Whenever he had to leave the house they published the most unflattering pics they could and painted him as a slob (he has a big belly!)
In desperation, he spruced himself up and let them take some staged pics on the agreement they would leave him alone.
They didn’t, of course. Whether he got paid for them we don’t know for sure - I’d guess he did - but it’s really not miles away from Meghan releasing flattering pics for her website/business/blog.
How she could then ruthlessly cut him out of her life for good for that, I can’t fathom. Seems the punishment doesn’t quite fit the crime here…..because I can see it from his point of view, but not from hers in this case.
jet is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
claim, daily, mail, markle, meghan, privacy, wins


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts