[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by jet

Another, er, inconsistency - Reverend David Green "Its not legal to have your own vows, you can't get married twice.

Meghan "Three days before our wedding, we got married. No - one knows that."

BBC - A spokesperson for the Sussexes' said it was a private exchange of vows
that had been 'incorrectly described' by Meghan.

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

[jet]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

She said 'we got married 3 days before' though, not 'we exchanged private vows' which is a totally different thing as that isn't getting married.
Which made people think her big wedding 3 days later presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury was a sham.

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by jet

She said 'we got married 3 days before' though, not 'we exchanged private vows' which is a totally different thing as that isn't getting married.
Which made people think her big wedding 3 days later presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury was a sham.

Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

[jet]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

There are many inconsistencies in what she and Harry said actually. If you are doing a 'tell all' interview and want people to believe your words, its imperative that you get all your facts straight and not 'incorrectly describe' events.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

you cant legally get married in the UK without 2 witnesses

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

The grasping at straws is honestly ridiculous