[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by jet

She said 'we got married 3 days before' though, not 'we exchanged private vows' which is a totally different thing as that isn't getting married.
Which made people think her big wedding 3 days later presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury was a sham.

Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying