[user104658]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Yup, She's just been made an example because it's good for the optics, basically. Completely hypocritical and unethical to leave someone stateless regardless of what they've done but doing so pleases the easily pleased.

The hilarious thing (OK not hilarious, it's not a humorous situation, but in terms of this debate, pretty funny) is that people don't seem to realise just how many extremely dangerous individuals living in this country UK security services have on various lists and being monitored constantly. The argument seems to be that she's "just too dangerous" to have even enter the country... even if she would be in jail . A girl who was brainwashed online as a teenager, is barely into her 20's now, and has most likely never actively engaged in an attack. This isn't a defense of her it's just pointing out that she is, quite obviously, comparatively nowhere NEAR as much of a "risk" as hundreds of other individuals already living free in Britain. Thus, it becomes very clear that the reasons for all of this are not because it's "too dangerous" at all, and simply because it's so high profile. The way people talk about it (including the government) you'd think she was some sort of mastermind cell leader.