[jet]

Originally Posted by LaLaLand

They bore me to tears in all honesty.

Much rather Haz n Megz even with all the controversy - much more intriguing and exciting pair.

Mind you - I suppose boring and unassuming is what’s wanted/needed for a monarch so.

William and Kate are very well suited to their future roles as King and Queen.
Thank goodness Harry was never the heir, what a disaster that would have been, truly the end of the monarchy. It’s all very well being entertained by their attention seeking, their lies, their money grabbing, their hypocrisy and their perpetual whining, but that’s what they are worth now - soap opera entertainment.
What a comedown from being high ranking members of the Monarchy. Their departure has been an unmitigated disaster so far.

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I disagree….Harry and Meghan and their ridiculous Podcasts are just proving how out of touch they are with the Common people…

Exactly

[arista]

[arista]

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Just leaning right into the misogyny now eh jet . At least you're not trying to pretend it's anything else now I guess.

Describing someone looking like they are taking a dump is misogynistic?
Your ridiculous reaching in H&M threads is par for the course TS.

[glib]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Like it or not the modern Royal family has relied on characters like Princess Diana and Harry and Meghan to come along and keep them culturally relevant. Boring and unassuming might have been ideal traits decades ago but it's not what is going to keep them going in this day and age.

They're also lucky Liz has reigned for as long as she has because that's made her become an attraction in herself, when she's gone what is keeping the rest of the world interested in our royals?

No they haven’t. The high end weddings that have attracted billions of viewers worldwide have. The work they do for charity has. The Monarchy has always been a staple of Britain. It will always be culturally relevant.

And to ask you your own question, what is it about Queen Liz that has made the royal family so ‘interesting’?

The world is not solely interested in Queen Elizabeth herself, they are interested in the monarchy system, which would have been abolished in their countries centuries. ago, and the fabulous architecture , such as Buckingham, that accompanies it.

Not to mention the fact the monarch rules over the likes of Australia and Canada, with close links to India and the Caribbean.

[Cherie]

The Queen looks so thin now, I hope she is not forced to step down through ill health

[arista]

Originally Posted by Cherie

The Queen looks so thin now, I hope she is not forced to step down through ill health

I doubt that.

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I disagree….Harry and Meghan and their ridiculous Podcasts are just proving how out of touch they are with the Common people…

"The common people"

Originally Posted by jet

Describing someone looking like they are taking a dump is misogynistic?
Your ridiculous reaching in H&M threads is par for the course TS.

Your post comparing two women and which one is more elegant and laughing at the other, suggesting that they look like they're taking a sh*t in public, is misogynistic. Yes. People really struggle with this don't they?

Originally Posted by glib

Not to mention the fact the monarch rules over the likes of Australia and Canada, with close links to India and the Caribbean.

"The monarch" doesn't rule over anything at all, not even England, in any way, let alone the other commonwealth/ex-empire nations. We have a symbolic monarchy, not an active one. You do understand that, right? The UK is ruled by a gaggle of Eton toffs headed up by a scraggy-haired snake oil salesman, The Queen has absolutely no real power of any kind (other than being an exceptionally wealthy lady; but the Royals don't even leverage that power the way other wealthy people do).

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Your post comparing two women and which one is more elegant and laughing at the other, suggesting that they look like they're taking a sh*t in public, is misogynistic. Yes. People really struggle with this don't they?

Y tho.

Some people do look more elegant than others, and some stances do make people look like they're crapping. Comparing these attributes between two women doesn't imply misogyny.

[bots]

i won't be calling her queen so i don't care

[Zizu]

Queenie must be losing it ..

The Royals were in a right state before all the Randy Andy stuff and this will tip them over the edge ..

I don’t know anyone who doesn’t despise Charlie’s mistress


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

She is hardly the devil

Pretty close though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by LaLaLand

Good. Nice lady by all accounts.

Love that she does a lot with dogs, and has herself adopted dogs from rescue centres. Kind hearted.

Also cheated on her husband with Charlie behind the back of a newly wed Di as well

Millions won’t forget and forgive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Yes she has two rescue dogs when it would have been easy to get pedigrees

Her and Charles are suited, it’s a shame he didn’t marry her to begin with,

Yeah rather than ruining two marriages/ families / and Di


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by glib

People love Kate & Will, their humour, compassion, loyalty, and down to earth-ness.and they were certainly be King & queen within the next 10-20 years, so it’s not the beginning of the end

They also loved Harry soooooo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I adored Diana…however much I hated what happened between Charles and Camilla and what it did to Diana…Camilla has always remained in the background and earned respect imo. They should have been together from the start but it wasn’t to be because she was a divorcee…
Charles and Camilla as King and Queen won’t make the impact that William and Kate would if the Royal family is going to remain an institution…

I’d rather Charles and her just disappeared out of sight ... I’m truly amazed that she has the audacity to even show her face in public


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Also cheated on her husband with Charlie behind the back of a newly wed Di as well

Millions won’t forget and forgive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It seems public perception has changed, many more people now divorce and find their soulmate second time round ....people are just not that bothered by it any more ...it all happened 30 plus years ago, people have more to worry about than Camilla being Queen

[Denver]

The Queen should banish them all until she gets down Towards Queen Beatrice and Eugenie

[Denver]

Its an actual crying shame Ann is the next Queen

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

You don’t even know the woman.

Says sheriff who will berate Meghan at every opportunity

[jet]

I adored Diana, and the sad thing is she and Charles were just not suited at all. Neither of them were saints. It was around 5 years after their marriage before Charles resumed his affair with Camilla, although maintaining his friendship with her during those years drove Diana wildly jealous as she knew his heart really belonged to Camilla. By that time Diana was having affairs of her own.
Long after the divorce Diana said Charles was a good man and one of the kindest men she had ever known.

The Crown (written by an anti - monarchist) is mainly fiction but many people believe its way OTT portrayal of Diana, Charles and Camilla is the truth. It really isn’t.
Camilla has come a long way from getting rotten eggs thrown at her in the street and having to hide indoors for months. She has quietly worked at her many charities and has devoted herself to supporting Charles and the Queen all these years. I never thought I’d say this, because I loved Diana, but she has earned the respect she now has from many in the public and the Queen. Fair play to her.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Says sheriff who will berate Meghan at every opportunity

Camilla is very private; Meghan very much isn't.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Your post comparing two women and which one is more elegant and laughing at the other, suggesting that they look like they're taking a sh*t in public, is misogynistic. Yes. People really struggle with this don't they?

No, they don't. You seem to be struggling with the definition however.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

I adored Diana, and the sad thing is she and Charles were just not suited at all. Neither of them were saints. It was around 5 years after their marriage before Charles resumed his affair with Camilla, although maintaining his friendship with her during those years drove Diana wildly jealous as she knew his heart really belonged to Camilla. By that time Diana was having affairs of her own.
Long after the divorce Diana said Charles was a good man and one of the kindest men she had ever known.

The Crown (written by an anti - monarchist) is mainly fiction but many people believe its way OTT portrayal of Diana, Charles and Camilla is the truth. It really isn’t.
Camilla has come a long way from getting rotten eggs thrown at her in the street and having to hide indoors for months. She has quietly worked at her many charities and has devoted herself to supporting Charles and the Queen all these years. I never thought I’d say this, because I loved Diana, but she has earned the respect she now has from many in the public and the Queen. Fair play to her.

Totally agree....like I said earlier, I hated what they did to Diana but its clear they were always meant to be. Charles and Camilla are clearly suited and happy together. She has kept a low profile and I have grown to like her and respect her for that.