[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Has anyone suggested otherwise?

I'm not sure if you're being deliberately obtuse here or you really don't understand what the issue is

The issue is, women thinking that because they won a championship they are suddenly better or know more than a man talking about a man’s game.

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

The issue is, women thinking that because they won a championship they are suddenly better or know more than a man talking about a man’s game.

It really isn't but ok...........

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It really isn't but ok...........

Face bothered face bothered

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

The issue is, women thinking that because they won a championship they are suddenly better or know more than a man talking about a man’s game.

Again no one said the female pundit knew more than the male pundit, can you point out who said this? as you seem to be reading things that do not exist


The issue is respect, plain and simple

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Again no one said the female pundit knew more than the male pundit, can you point out who said this? as you seem to be reading things that do not exist


The issue is respect, plain and simple

They should try respecting a man that had a great career infootball and has forgotten more than most know about mens football

Woman’s football is not in the same league as mens football so the sense of out rage is laughable.