[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

its a finite cost though, and paying them 2 months is a lot less than paying them indefinitely

3 months wages for half the staff payable up front ( now ) seems like a massive outgoing / expense if they are leaking money each day though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Zizu

3 months wages for half the staff payable up front ( now ) seems like a massive outgoing / expense if they are leaking money each day though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I see what you're saying but after the three months, they'd certainly see the difference.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Zizu

3 months wages for half the staff payable up front ( now ) seems like a massive outgoing / expense if they are leaking money each day though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

every company that is leaking money does exactly the same, its standard practice. Its 60 days btw, and that is so he doesnt fall foul of california employment law

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

every company that is leaking money does exactly the same, its standard practice. Its 60 days btw, and that is so he doesnt fall foul of california employment law

I saw reports he’d offered more than the set 2 months amount to appease everyone


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro