Quote:
Originally Posted by joeysteele
Not sure its weakness.
I'm pretty stunned on the tuition fees turnaround.
I'm not like Slim YET, however I'm seeing more and more what Slim is saying.
Sorry Slim fit some reason this wouldn't double quote.
I've now heard from 4 leading figures in Labour, including Thornberry today on Politics live.
The message that if Labour wins they are going to inherit a really big mess.
I'm almost on the road of thinking Starmer maybe doesntvrelush winning the next election.
So hoping to drastically cut the Cons majority to a very small one or take it to a hung parliament even.
I am scratching my head at this point.
I'm not the only one either.
I'm NOT happy at the tuition fees change.
Not at all
It was a very important issue for me in 2010.
I'll see what he comes up with instead of it but for me it's a really bad and wrong move he's done on them at this moment in time.
|
Tories inherited a mess in 2010 - not because of labour, but because of the banking crash in 08. They chose the no spend, cut everything austerity route that Starmer looks set to continue.
If the country is a mess, it needs investment, not more austerity, and that's the main issue. Starmer is pretty much guaranteed to win, but his lack of vision will see him kicked out at the first opportunity, which will lead to another 15 years out of power to the tories, resulting in another lost generation, forcing the country evermore righrwards -which always happens in times of poverty.
He had such a massive lead that he didn't need to take advice from Blairites, he needed an ambitious, progressive programme. He's as bad as Johnson, just in a different way. Johnson is about himself, Starmer is about power for powers sake.
I know I'm preaching to the choir a bit, Joey, as I know you don't really disagree, but Starmer is a duplicitous shambles of a man.
He chose to fight the left rather than the tories. Crazy.