Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

View Poll Results: "Is it real or not?"
No-no. Team C.I.T. (cis., intersex., trans.), no-doubt. 1 12.50%
No-no. Team C.I.T. (cis., intersex., trans.), no-doubt.
1 12.50%
'Yeah, erm' (I honestly don't know what to think) 0 0%
'Yeah, erm' (I honestly don't know what to think)
0 0%
Only up to a certain extent. It might've gone a little too far 0 0%
Only up to a certain extent. It might've gone a little too far
0 0%
Everyone has the right to self-identify however but half of it's nonsense 6 75.00%
Everyone has the right to self-identify however but half of it's nonsense
6 75.00%
"He" and "she" pronouns should honestly be abolished. 1 12.50%
"He" and "she" pronouns should honestly be abolished.
1 12.50%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 16-05-2023, 04:11 PM #3
Urban Cragou's Avatar
Urban Cragou Urban Cragou is offline
Redway
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 13,282


Urban Cragou Urban Cragou is offline
Redway
Urban Cragou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 13,282


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W View Post
Gender as a whole is a load of nonsense. It's nothing more than a social construct, we are our bodies, nothing more.
Something a lot of people forget is that clothes/accessories (just to use that as example now) that are highly feminised as we know them now were originally intended for men. Make-up, wigs, high-heels and even the colour pink were originally intended for men. As far as contrary doctrine goes you get certain Nigerian churches (Deeper Life being a notorious example, not that the church as a whole is too bad) banning women from wearing trousers despite the fact that hardly anyone wore trousers up-until about 200 years ago (and even then they were only made for a specific purpose, i.e., horse-riding) and even places that have earlier history and experiences with trousers often reserved them for women (India being a prime example). They try and push post-colonial indoctrination that only applied to a very particular time in history in the grand scheme of things as not just "African culture" but the actual word of God and we all know that ain't it. Even the overseeing superintendent himself (pastor Kumuyi) low-key admits that and actually wants to abolish all that crap. I can understand the bit about not wearing jewellery in church and women covering their hair in the house of God but the rest is just copy-cat truckster garbage. And it’s not like the men in the Bible ever wore trousers so y’know.

"Non-binary" per-se is utter nonsense, too.
__________________


At Obe’s Kitchen, it’s lamb-season all-year-round, not just at Easter. I rate that.

Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers.

London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured.

Last edited by Urban Cragou; 17-05-2023 at 10:56 PM.
Urban Cragou is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
nonbinary, palaver, stand


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts