| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
They can't. The Royal Institution forbids the monetization of their family minors for commercial purposes.
Last edited by jet; 17-01-2024 at 04:26 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Deny, Defend, Depose.
|
Quote:
"a web of lies and dodgy motives."
__________________
![]()
Last edited by The Slim Reaper; 17-01-2024 at 11:40 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I said they had trademarked the name for monetary purposes, which they had. They subsequently discovered that its use was forbidden by the Institution. Harry should have known this, but well, he’s Harry….and when Meghan sniffs dollar signs she just blunders ahead regardless. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Deny, Defend, Depose.
|
Quote:
However... You go back to making the same claim about them. You have no idea about the ins or outs of anything. Pretty sure all of their expensive trademark lawyers would have known about the information you're pretending they had no idea about. Seems a bit dodgy in motive to me, but whaddo I know?
__________________
![]()
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
FYI you do not need an attorney to file an application for a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|