[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

You're such a literalist when it suits you.

I feel like I'm not being literal enough in response though.

What I'm saying is that no amount of "societal wokery" in the general population is going to make it more challenging to recruit and train effective military personnel. It just won't. Being asked to fight in morally ambiguous conflicts/conflicts with ambiguous goals might. But "generations of softies making soft soldiers" just is not a realistic outcome.

So it's only "a problem" in a conscription situation where there's a requirement for those who aren't signing up voluntarily to fight. And if that happens we're ****ed anyway.

Plus the actual issue will not be people being "too soft to fight", the problem will be lack of automatic adherence to authority. The wokies are actually quite violent/destructive at times.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

But they sure are whinging about it being changed. And it would be funny.

Wasn't there a similar "incident" a few years ago with another kid's song?

No ****er gives 2 *****.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Beso

No ****er gives 2 *****.

Well I agree they shouldn't, but they seem to...

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

Potentially engage brain before posting Mock - we're talking about primary school children and you don't want the old bill coming round to rifle through your hard drive.

It's a joke in general, not about Primary School kids.

I don't think that I should have to clarify that tbh.

One of the main reasons why I can't get into modern Japanese Anime series is the pro-Paedophilia that's in a lot of it.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

I think we should change it to "What shall we do with the whinging boomer" and watch an implosion

What's wrong with a whinging boomer?

But being serious, that would be a funny song tbf.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

Potentially engage brain before posting Mock - we're talking about primary school children and you don't want the old bill coming round to rifle through your hard drive.

I've edited the post a little bit, just to make it more clear to people.

I would honestly have liked to believe that people could tell that my post was talking about a Dominatrix Susan Boyle was meant to be punishing adult men, not children.

I also would like to believe that everyone on here would know from my previous posts on here about how much I'm against Paedophilia and other abhorrent sexual acts such as Rape and Bestiality.

I get that the thread that I've picked was poorly timed tbf, I will concede on that.

But I feel like my intention was clear that I was having a joke about envisioning Susan Boyle in Leather being into BDSM punishing adults. So yeah it's admittedly still very dark, but it weren't intended to be about children at all as I haven't made Paedophile jokes since I left my teens.

I'm sorry for anyone that misunderstood my post though, as I do have a very odd sense of humour.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

I feel like I'm not being literal enough in response though.

What I'm saying is that no amount of "societal wokery" in the general population is going to make it more challenging to recruit and train effective military personnel. It just won't. Being asked to fight in morally ambiguous conflicts/conflicts with ambiguous goals might. But "generations of softies making soft soldiers" just is not a realistic outcome.

So it's only "a problem" in a conscription situation where there's a requirement for those who aren't signing up voluntarily to fight. And if that happens we're ****ed anyway.

Plus the actual issue will not be people being "too soft to fight", the problem will be lack of automatic adherence to authority. The wokies are actually quite violent/destructive at times.

Ohhh pipe down, do. How much mileage can you get out of my one comment? Get a hobby.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Hopefully the adult will get whipped by Susan Boyle in a Dominatrix outfit.

No one thought you were referring to children, Mock. There was no need to change this for someone with so much time on their hands the dissect everyone's posts but their own.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Livia

No one thought you were referring to children, Mock. There was no need to change this for someone with so much time on their hands the dissect everyone's posts but their own.

Thanks Livia.