[Christmas Lights]

Originally Posted by Mrluvaluva

My point is. Nobody knew when it was initially announced how many would be entering The Vault. Some assumed it would be all 8.

For me, that would be far more interesting, as you then couldn't work out the hierarchy in the other 6.

If it's true, that the 4 who entered The Vault had the fewest votes from the public, the process of elimination that happened would tell us that Nathan and Segun now had the least public support at that point and were the weakest in the winning stakes. I don't buy into that.

I'm cynical. I think a lot of the reasoning for this comes from hearsay.

In the first round it was notable that Segun had to pick the other 3 himself. This time BB chose the 4. Some might believe it was the bottom 4 but that's not necessarily so.

You understand where I'm coming from?

There has been no clear point on this

I get what you're saying,but I believe Segun really has low votes & in the bottom 3 with Sarah & Tom. I have my doubts about Nathan,and BB probably put him in as a random one .

As it would give the game away,and ruin the surprise.


I guess we'll see what order the housemates finish in on the final.

But I'm thinking Sarah ,Tom & Segun really are low in public votes & Nathan was thrown into the mix randomly. As I keep thinking he'll finish high in the final.

[Mrluvaluva]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

I get what you're saying,but I believe Segun really has low votes & in the bottom 3 with Sarah & Tom. I have my doubts about Nathan,and BB probably put him in as a random one .

As it would give the game away,and ruin the surprise.


I guess we'll see what order the housemates finish in on the final.

But I'm thinking Sarah ,Tom & Segun really are low in public votes & Nathan was thrown into the mix randomly. As I keep thinking he'll finish high in the final.

But now do the public think Nathan, for example, is low in votes, thus potentially garnering him more support? Or Segun? We don't know how the current voting stands. It could be a clever ploy.

They should have just opened the vote to win tonight imo. A vote to evict and a vote to save/win are 2 very different things and have different outcomes.

Anyway...

Que sera, sera.

[Christmas Lights]

Originally Posted by Mrluvaluva

But now do the public think Nathan, for example, is low in votes, thus potentially garnering him more support? Or Segun? We don't know how the current voting stands. It could be a clever ploy.

They should have just opened the vote to win tonight imo. A vote to evict and a vote to save/win are 2 very different things and have different outcomes.

Anyway...

Que sera, sera.

Yeah it is very weird how BB has done this , and it seems the backdoor evictions were plenty this series. Even Will was saying on L& L ....how the results may have been very different if it was 'VTE ' instead of ' VTW '.

I think people will assume Nathan & Segun were legit in danger to get evicted. But I don't think Segun will get enough support to finish any higher than 6th place, but the ploy has probably worked in Nathan's favour. As I keep thinking he'll finish 3rd place.

[Cherry Christmas]

Not sure BB confirmed it was the 4 with the lowest votes, he just said two would not be returning, if he had said 4 with the lowest it is unlikely Nathan would have been whining in the DR about being taken in for a second evening? unless they said it on L and L?

[Ammi]

…how I understood it as we were watching it…is that BB gave the four housemates to go into The Vault…two of which were the lowest voted…?…(…the other two, could have been placed anywhere in the votes…)…and obviously they did their bets to see if they correctly chose those two lowest, which they did…but the other two weren’t necessarily part of the lower voting…they just weren’t teo that would win the bet for them…but then others said that they all 4 were the lowest so it really wasn’t clear…/…I didn’t understand it to be all four, only two lowest and two others…

[Ammi]

…I think that I might replay it at some point today to see if it’s any more clear…

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Ammi

…how I understood it as we were watching it…is that BB gave the four housemates to go into The Vault…two of which were the lowest voted…?…(…the other two, could have been placed anywhere in the votes…)…and obviously they did their bets to see if they correctly chose those two lowest, which they did…but the other two weren’t necessarily part of the lower voting…they just weren’t teo that would win the bet for them…but then others said that they all 4 were the lowest so it really wasn’t clear…/…I didn’t understand it to be all four, only two lowest and two others…

This is how I understood it as well

[Mrluvaluva]

Originally Posted by Cherie

This is how I understood it as well

But, with all due respect , that's how it was perceived but not necessarily how it happened.

I question it.

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Ammi

…how I understood it as we were watching it…is that BB gave the four housemates to go into The Vault…two of which were the lowest voted…?…(…the other two, could have been placed anywhere in the votes…)…and obviously they did their bets to see if they correctly chose those two lowest, which they did…but the other two weren’t necessarily part of the lower voting…they just weren’t teo that would win the bet for them…but then others said that they all 4 were the lowest so it really wasn’t clear…/…I didn’t understand it to be all four, only two lowest and two others…

At no point did they say the 4 with the lowest votes...otherwise it wouldn't be fair on the other 2. They wouldnt deliberately tell 2 people you are in the final BUT you have the lowest votes. However it could be very mis leading.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

At no point did they say the 4 with the lowest votes...otherwise it wouldn't be fair on the other 2. They wouldnt deliberately tell 2 people you are in the final BUT you have the lowest votes. However it could be very mis leading.

…yeah, I think that BB knew what it would lead people/fans to think without using any wording that actually said that…/… cheeky…