[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamhxo

they should also make a rule that peopl who opt out of donating their organs when they die, are not eligable to receive donations!

But if you die, surely you wouldnt need one?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Smithy

But if you die, surely you wouldnt need one?

If Shasowns idea was done where unless you specifically said that you ddn't want your organs donated then they automatically were after you died. Then the people (while still alive) who took the opt out, I want to be buried whole option, would not be eligable for organ donations should they ever need them.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamhxo

If Shasowns idea was done where unless you specifically said that you ddn't want your organs donated then they automatically were after you died. Then the people (while still alive) who took the opt out, I want to be buried whole option, would not be eligable for organ donations should they ever need them.

Some people just may not know enough aout organ donation or not know who to become a donor, doesnt mean they're selfish.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Some people just may not know enough aout organ donation or not know who to become a donor, doesnt mean they're selfish.

No, this idea was to be mixed with shasowns idea of having an opt-out list, instead of joining the register.

Those who opt out, wouldnt be eligible for a transplant, should they need one.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

No, this idea was to be mixed with shasowns idea of having an opt-out list, instead of joining the register.

Those who opt out, wouldnt be eligible for a transplant, should they need one.

Oh, ok

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Some people just may not know enough aout organ donation or not know who to become a donor, doesnt mean they're selfish.

did you read anything I wrote? I'm talking about if Shasowns idea was put into practice not the way it is now. His idea was that, everybody is automatically a donor and if they din't want to be they would have to state that instead of the way it is now which is the opposite way round!

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamhxo

did you read anything I wrote? I'm talking about if Shasowns idea was put into practice not the way it is now. His idea was that, everybody is automatically a donor and if they din't want to be they would have to state that instead of the way it is now which is the opposite way round!

Sort of
I thought you emphaising your previous point though