Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 19-05-2010, 01:43 PM #20
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
The voice of reason
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 103,956


Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
The voice of reason
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 103,956


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KG. View Post
How would teaching children at that age that sex is not an option be any more beneficial than teaching safe sex?

I know it's not the case with all children, but once you tell a child/teenager something is forbidden, there will always be a few, if not a lot of them that will go and do it. As Stu said, whether you like it or not, there will be children doing it, no matter how much you try and teach them that it is not an option.

The sensible kids that age won't have sex then anyway, therefore educating the ones that will go and have sex about safe sex is the only option imo.
and you think that "the ones that will go and have sex" are the ones who will be influenced by "Charlie Condom" and sex education?

i dont
Crimson Dynamo is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
13yearolds, charlie, condom, condoms, promotes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts