[Shiner]

Do the maths? Erm, it was 89% to evict. At best "the maths" tells us that Nathan was not liked and compared to him the voters are more ambivalent about JJ. If it were a "vote to save" and JJ got 89% then you'd have a good point.

[stonedape]

Originally Posted by Shiner

Do the maths? Erm, it was 89% to evict. At best "the maths" tells us that Nathan was not liked and compared to him the voters are more ambivalent about JJ. If it were a "vote to save" and JJ got 89% then you'd have a good point.

In a head to head, a vote to evict is the same thing as a vote to save. That's what's nice about head to heads...it's harder to fly UTR with two bigger personalities getting the evict votes, like Caohwecmwe did in Week 3.

[Shiner]

Originally Posted by stonedape

In a head to head, a vote to evict is the same thing as a vote to save.....

It's so not.
That's like saying that Nat's 89% was just made from JJ fans calling because he was up against their favourite, which is preposterous. It's partly true, but his 89% was actually made up of "counter votes" and "hate votes" (which is why Endemol run it like that, to make more money).
In a vote to save, Nat's fans would have vote for him and JJ's fans for JJ.