[Shiner]

I'ts likely that the "hate" votes would have been from his picking on Ben (you of all people should have got that) coupled with his monumental stupidity in general add that to what you said about him not doing all that much and you have a HM who is hard to relate to. You are right to agree that a portion of votes will have been from JJ fans but "common sense" dictates that his votes would have been universal accross the all fan basses. Your original argument was that a head to head vote to evict situation is the same as "vote to save" situation, which I think we've cleared up that it most definitely isn't.

[stonedape]

Originally Posted by Shiner

I'ts likely that the "hate" votes would have been from his picking on Ben (you of all people should have got that) coupled with his monumental stupidity in general add that to what you said about him not doing all that much and you have a HM who is hard to relate to. You are right to agree that a portion of votes will have been from JJ fans but "common sense" dictates that his votes would have been universal accross the all fan basses. Your original argument was that a head to head vote to evict situation is the same as "vote to save" situation, which I think we've cleared up that it most definitely isn't.

No, technically it is. You are literally voting for X to stay by voting for Y to go. But I can't read minds, neither can you, maybe it was 75% love for JJ, 25% hate for Nathan, one, both, or neither. So your guess is as good as mine, but if you think a non-entity getting 90% of votes because they're hated and they're ambivalent to JJ makes sense, I disagree. My argument from the beginning is that no one cares about Nathan, and lots of people care about JJ. I just brought up the fact that vote to save is the same as vote to evict in a head to head to try to get you thinking, but that clearly hasn't worked.

p.s. all arguments are forgiven for your avatar/sig.

[Shiner]

Originally Posted by stonedape

No, technically it is. You are literally voting for X to stay by voting for Y to go. But I can't read minds, neither can you, maybe it was 75% love for JJ, 25% hate for Nathan, one, both, or neither. So your guess is as good as mine, but if you think a non-entity getting 90% of votes because they're hated and they're ambivalent to JJ makes sense, I disagree. My argument from the beginning is that no one cares about Nathan, and lots of people care about JJ. I just brought up the fact that vote to save is the same as vote to evict in a head to head to try to get you thinking, but that clearly hasn't worked.

p.s. all arguments are forgiven for your avatar/sig.

No "technically" it's the opposite.

Creepycat sends his love.

[Claymores]

Jedward Fever told us all he phoned JJ 536 times - that must be most of the 11%

That's his pocket-money for 2010 blown so JJ will be safe next time too - hahahahahaha

[headaball]

Originally Posted by Claymores

Jedward Fever told us all he phoned JJ 536 times

Seriously?