| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
'waving cutesy' aside - what are you saying then? That it is a disease in the womb?
Is it some chemicals that find the developing fetus and 'infect' it? You are closer to the idea there are people who would otherwise be hetero or 'normal' and would be originally intended to be 'straight', but, then something affects them and changes it? The best studies we have show something like 1 to 3% have, at some time, had some 'homosexual experience', but, even that needs to be looked at when this can include people who (for example) had a single experience in university they describe as 'homosexual'. As for those 'exclusively homosexual' and 'ongoing' this isn't easy to narrow down but it may be less than 1% A lot of companies want to find out more and more about this demographic and sell them things, but, they can't find much more than about 1 or 2%. You could find more depending on what region, city, area and less in another region city or area. One city I lived in and I could safely and easily say about 1 in every 25 people were 'actively exclusively homosexual'. In my hometown I would be shocked if you could find 1 in every 300. Again, don't assume I am 'opposed to gays'. I notice a few people are doing that. Don't. Nothing I'm telling you actually tells you that so don't assume. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|