[Shasown]

Originally Posted by arista

"Lesbians have a terrible deformity then.. useless breasts and a lot of indoor plumbing that takes up a lot of energy for no reason?"


You are having a Laugh.


There is No God , anyway.

Of course there is, he exists in the hearts and minds of man.

[arista]

The God Delusion book
will give you the honest truth.

[arista]

" Of course there is, he exists in the hearts and minds of man. "


So your Pathetic God gave us Hitler.

There is No God.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by arista

" Of course there is, he exists in the hearts and minds of man. "


So your Pathetic God gave us Hitler.

There is No God.

Think about what I wrote arista, it may be a little too deep for you.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

god loves a nice big cock up his arse

[BBfan46]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

Why do you think people are born gay?

If you think they are born gay then you are making a strong argument for some kind of retardation or medical problem:
- Either they were born with the right brain but wrong genitals,
or,
- maybe born with something wrong with their brain.

Lesbians have a terrible deformity then.. useless breasts and a lot of indoor plumbing that takes up a lot of energy for no reason?

Why would the gays have sperm production? Do you figure that is a deformity in them?

So 10% of the 6.7 billion have a retardation? It's no more a retardation than Ginger hair or being left-handed. People have been gay since the beginning of time, but it's a more open society nowadays, being white is technically a 'retardation' as humans are supposed to be black. As for your right brain wrong genitals argument, that is transsexualism and a different topic, gay people have no desire to be of the other gender. Lesbians do not have useless breasts, they still work but they may not be put to personal use same for the sperm of gay men, but I may refer you to surrogate mothers and sperm donation, both of these still render a purpose, unlike your brain which has difficulty breaking out of the medieval view point.

[Captain.Remy]

we should burn them all to be honest so there won't be any debate.

except the hot lesbians tho. keep them, they might be useful in parties.

[BBfan46]

Originally Posted by Captain.Remy

we should burn them all to be honest so there won't be any debate.

except the hot lesbians tho. keep them, they might be useful in parties.

You're repulsive.

[Shaun]

BBfan46, he was being sarcastic as were GypsyGoth and I on the last page.

Good to see ElProximo being the cosmopolitan he always was. [this is sarcasm too, BBFan ]

[Captain.Remy]

Originally Posted by BBfan46

You're repulsive.

Why is that? Is that forbidden to have some fun with hot lesbians? I swear I won't put drugs in their drink this time. oh wait...

[BBfan46]

Originally Posted by Shaun

BBfan46, he was being sarcastic as were GypsyGoth and I on the last page.

Good to see ElProximo being the cosmopolitan he always was. [this is sarcasm too, BBFan ]

You know I knew that but for some reason I decided to be mean.

[Vicky.]

If there was a god, which I very much doubt there is...I see no reason for him/her to smite gay people down. He/she is supposedly all knowing and all loving. He probably has a few gay pornos hidden away anyway, sitting on the back of those cloudy shelves of his.

[Captain.Remy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

If there was a god, which I very much doubt there is...I see no reason for him/her to smite gay people down. He/she is supposedly all knowing and all loving. He probably has a few gay pornos hidden away anyway, sitting on the back of those cloudy shelves of his.

DAMN IT, A NON-HOT LESBIAN DINOSAUR ! HANG HER BY THE BOOBS AND BURN HER SLOWLY !!!

[BBfan46]

Let's all just love eachother

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by BBfan46

So 10% of the 6.7 billion have a retardation?

Not anywhere close to 10% of the population chooses homosexuality. The very best research we can find may have less than 1% who can be said to actively, exclusively and be 'ongoing' in this kind of thing.

But it was YOU who may suppose they were born with a 'retardation' of either the body or the mind.

It's no more a retardation than Ginger hair or being left-handed.

No, these do not change anything and the hand and hair still have the same point and purpose as any other.

People have been gay since the beginning of time, but it's a more open society nowadays,

This is baseless and we have no reason to believe 'people have been gay' since the beginning of time.
We do know that homosexuality appears throughout the recorded history of human civilization including gangs who would go about raping and murdering men.
For almost all of human history, crossing cultures and continents where we can find it practices (and mostly it is considered perverse),
but,
For the most part it is considered something you can 'do'.
Not a 'race'.
Not another 'gender'.
Not something where a type of person called 'a gay' is born.

It is a sexual interest. It could be a 'phase'. It could depend on what they were into at the time.
A Roman might be into slave girls and then at another time take a teen boy as a 'student' and sodomize him whenever,
but,
then he may be married and devoted to a wife or later they both like heterosexual orgies.

This idea you have about a kind of '3rd gender' a type of human that is born called 'A gay' who (you believe) is meant to desire same genders 'from birth' is bizarre.
It is an aberrant belief compared to human history. It is a strange new idea you are testing in just a recent generation.

being white is technically a 'retardation' as humans are supposed to be black.

No. Humans are all the same colour (it is a yellowish brown though a red tint runs through us too) and the difference is having more or less which is higher or lower in the skin,
but,
if you wanted a 'comparison' this could be like having a longer or shorter penis or bigger or smaller breasts - it doesn't change anything for the penis or breast or what it can do.

As for your right brain wrong genitals argument, that is transsexualism and a different topic,

So you would agree they have a medical problem and surgery is needed to correct it.
It seems that transsexuals would agree with this idea where they were born with the wrong parts.

gay people have no desire to be of the other gender.

nonsense. it presumes a type of people called 'the gay people' and doesn't square with the best research where we see far more 'in and out' and 'back and forth' and nowhere near these strict definitions.

But even that doesn't tell us anything for your claims. Not long ago I watched a documentary (might have been C4) about 'shoe-sexuals' but the idea was exploring a surprisingly popular fetish of men who are sexually infatuated with shoes.
One was even arrested making love to Mariah Carey (the pop star) to her shoes!
Shoesexuals become so infatuated that they get to a point they cannot even become sexually aroused unless there is shoes involved. They could make love to their wife - only if she wears shoes and he can ___ the shoes,
but,
they can exclusively become aroused by shoes alone at all times.

Would you now claim they are simply a type of human.. like a 'gender' who are simply born this way?

Lesbians do not have useless breasts, they still work but they may not be put to personal use

The breast work but they are not used. We call this 'useless'. You believe that. I don't.

same for the sperm of gay men, but I may refer you to surrogate mothers and sperm donation,

So you think the sperm production in this kind of 'gay human' is meant for being taken by heterosexuals?
Are they our 'cows' then?

both of these still render a purpose, unlike your brain which has difficulty breaking out of the medieval view point.

The medieval period was a great time of medical advances, scientific advancement and progressive understanding of the natural world around us,
but,
they might have shared some views with you (and I disagree) but one of these might be that people are born with some kind of spirit that could dictate their behavior.
You believe this. You believe some babies are born as 'gay humans' and although there is no detected physical or even physiological difference - you just 'believe' some kind of 'gay spirit' will turn them into a different kind of human.
I have more progressive ideas. Youre stuck in 1982 leftist agenda myths.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

Not anywhere close to 10% of the population chooses homosexuality. The very best research we can find may have less than 1% who can be said to actively, exclusively and be 'ongoing' in this kind of thing.

But it was YOU who may suppose they were born with a 'retardation' of either the body or the mind.



No, these do not change anything and the hand and hair still have the same point and purpose as any other.



This is baseless and we have no reason to believe 'people have been gay' since the beginning of time.
We do know that homosexuality appears throughout the recorded history of human civilization including gangs who would go about raping and murdering men.
For almost all of human history, crossing cultures and continents where we can find it practices (and mostly it is considered perverse),
but,
For the most part it is considered something you can 'do'.
Not a 'race'.
Not another 'gender'.
Not something where a type of person called 'a gay' is born.

It is a sexual interest. It could be a 'phase'. It could depend on what they were into at the time.
A Roman might be into slave girls and then at another time take a teen boy as a 'student' and sodomize him whenever,
but,
then he may be married and devoted to a wife or later they both like heterosexual orgies.

This idea you have about a kind of '3rd gender' a type of human that is born called 'A gay' who (you believe) is meant to desire same genders 'from birth' is bizarre.
It is an aberrant belief compared to human history. It is a strange new idea you are testing in just a recent generation.



No. Humans are all the same colour (it is a yellowish brown though a red tint runs through us too) and the difference is having more or less which is higher or lower in the skin,
but,
if you wanted a 'comparison' this could be like having a longer or shorter penis or bigger or smaller breasts - it doesn't change anything for the penis or breast or what it can do.



So you would agree they have a medical problem and surgery is needed to correct it.
It seems that transsexuals would agree with this idea where they were born with the wrong parts.



nonsense. it presumes a type of people called 'the gay people' and doesn't square with the best research where we see far more 'in and out' and 'back and forth' and nowhere near these strict definitions.

But even that doesn't tell us anything for your claims. Not long ago I watched a documentary (might have been C4) about 'shoe-sexuals' but the idea was exploring a surprisingly popular fetish of men who are sexually infatuated with shoes.
One was even arrested making love to Mariah Carey (the pop star) to her shoes!
Shoesexuals become so infatuated that they get to a point they cannot even become sexually aroused unless there is shoes involved. They could make love to their wife - only if she wears shoes and he can ___ the shoes,
but,
they can exclusively become aroused by shoes alone at all times.

Would you now claim they are simply a type of human.. like a 'gender' who are simply born this way?


The breast work but they are not used. We call this 'useless'. You believe that. I don't.


So you think the sperm production in this kind of 'gay human' is meant for being taken by heterosexuals?
Are they our 'cows' then?



The medieval period was a great time of medical advances, scientific advancement and progressive understanding of the natural world around us,
but,
they might have shared some views with you (and I disagree) but one of these might be that people are born with some kind of spirit that could dictate their behavior.
You believe this. You believe some babies are born as 'gay humans' and although there is no detected physical or even physiological difference - you just 'believe' some kind of 'gay spirit' will turn them into a different kind of human.
I have more progressive ideas. Youre stuck in 1982 leftist agenda myths.

people have sex with shoes?

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by jedward fever

people have sex with shoes?

Yeah, but don't be Shoephobic about it. It is their sexuality and we have to respect them.
It isn't a choice. They were born shoesexuals and actually a lot of them have been harassed and live in shame because of societies bigotry and hate towards them.
'Retifosexuals' are just a type of human or 'gender' who happen to be attracted to shoes.

Seriously though.. it is a real thing but we just call it a psychosexual disorder or simply a 'sex fetish'.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

Yeah, but don't be Shoephobic about it. It is their sexuality and we have to respect them.
It isn't a choice. They were born shoesexuals and actually a lot of them have been harassed and live in shame because of societies bigotry and hate towards them.
'Retifosexuals' are just a type of human or 'gender' who happen to be attracted to shoes.

Seriously though.. it is a real thing but we just call it a psychosexual disorder or simply a 'sex fetish'.

anyway theres a difference between gays and shoe lovers.

1.gay people are in love with a living person where as shoe lovers arent.
2.being gay isnt a choice and if god sent them to hell because of being gay then god is ridiculous.

[_Seth]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

the population chooses homosexuality.

It's not a choice you idiot.

If it is, could you give me a set of step-by-step instructions on how to become straight please?

[ElProximo]

[QUOTE=jedward fever;3792413]anyway theres a difference between gays and shoe lovers.

1.gay people are in love with a living person....

Say's who?
Which gay?
Why does 'being in love' even have anything to do with homosexuality anyways?

where as shoe lovers arent.

Who are you do judge? They are in love with a show and so that is their choice and how they were born.
Who are you to condemn them just because YOU think it must be another human.

2.being gay isnt a choice and if god sent them to hell because of being gay then god is ridiculous.

Being gay is a choice but I don't know anyone is 'sent to hell' for any such thing.
It may be there is no such thing as homosexuality in heaven and some people decide they would rather stay outside the gates??

[_Seth]

^Gonna answer my question or ignore it?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Think about what I wrote arista, it may be a little too deep for you.

[BBfan46]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

Not anywhere close to 10% of the population chooses homosexuality. The very best research we can find may have less than 1% who can be said to actively, exclusively and be 'ongoing' in this kind of thing.

But it was YOU who may suppose they were born with a 'retardation' of either the body or the mind.



No, these do not change anything and the hand and hair still have the same point and purpose as any other.



This is baseless and we have no reason to believe 'people have been gay' since the beginning of time.
We do know that homosexuality appears throughout the recorded history of human civilization including gangs who would go about raping and murdering men.
For almost all of human history, crossing cultures and continents where we can find it practices (and mostly it is considered perverse),
but,
For the most part it is considered something you can 'do'.
Not a 'race'.
Not another 'gender'.
Not something where a type of person called 'a gay' is born.

It is a sexual interest. It could be a 'phase'. It could depend on what they were into at the time.
A Roman might be into slave girls and then at another time take a teen boy as a 'student' and sodomize him whenever,
but,
then he may be married and devoted to a wife or later they both like heterosexual orgies.

This idea you have about a kind of '3rd gender' a type of human that is born called 'A gay' who (you believe) is meant to desire same genders 'from birth' is bizarre.
It is an aberrant belief compared to human history. It is a strange new idea you are testing in just a recent generation.



No. Humans are all the same colour (it is a yellowish brown though a red tint runs through us too) and the difference is having more or less which is higher or lower in the skin,
but,
if you wanted a 'comparison' this could be like having a longer or shorter penis or bigger or smaller breasts - it doesn't change anything for the penis or breast or what it can do.



So you would agree they have a medical problem and surgery is needed to correct it.
It seems that transsexuals would agree with this idea where they were born with the wrong parts.



nonsense. it presumes a type of people called 'the gay people' and doesn't square with the best research where we see far more 'in and out' and 'back and forth' and nowhere near these strict definitions.

But even that doesn't tell us anything for your claims. Not long ago I watched a documentary (might have been C4) about 'shoe-sexuals' but the idea was exploring a surprisingly popular fetish of men who are sexually infatuated with shoes.
One was even arrested making love to Mariah Carey (the pop star) to her shoes!
Shoesexuals become so infatuated that they get to a point they cannot even become sexually aroused unless there is shoes involved. They could make love to their wife - only if she wears shoes and he can ___ the shoes,
but,
they can exclusively become aroused by shoes alone at all times.

Would you now claim they are simply a type of human.. like a 'gender' who are simply born this way?


The breast work but they are not used. We call this 'useless'. You believe that. I don't.


So you think the sperm production in this kind of 'gay human' is meant for being taken by heterosexuals?
Are they our 'cows' then?



The medieval period was a great time of medical advances, scientific advancement and progressive understanding of the natural world around us,
but,
they might have shared some views with you (and I disagree) but one of these might be that people are born with some kind of spirit that could dictate their behavior.
You believe this. You believe some babies are born as 'gay humans' and although there is no detected physical or even physiological difference - you just 'believe' some kind of 'gay spirit' will turn them into a different kind of human.
I have more progressive ideas. Youre stuck in 1982 leftist agenda myths.

It's statistical fact in the Western World that 1 in 10 people would identify as LGBT. At no point did I ever state being gay was a retardation that was your prejudice being inclined to believe I did so would contradict my argument and therefore the purpose of the thread.

a Gay man's penis and a Straight man's penis have the same purpose to reproduce, a gay man doesn't feel the need to use this function as he is attracted to the same sex, it doesn't mean it's a retardation, the appendix has no use yet we still have them, sperm has little use to a gay man but he still produces it, therefore that argument cannot be contained.

The Third Gender as you refer to is illogical, there are two genders, male and female, a gender is determined by anatomy not by sexual attraction, the fact you claim to say homosexuality is a phase is ridiculous why would people choose to go through emotional torment?

People have been gay since Biblical times and the ancient Greeks before that, it's well known and documented... Wikipedia it bitch.

[BBfan46]

Originally Posted by arista

Thank you for plugging the **** out of this book.

[BBfan46]

Just so you know <insert prejudice user's name here> Gay people aren't cows, lesbians can be surrogate mothers therefore their reproductive organs have function and gay men can use sperm for donation and artificial insemination so their genitalia is not useless as you'd have people believe its 2010 not 210.