[MrWong]

Originally Posted by patsylimerick

How do you find the practice of sweeping generalistions works for you in debating terms so far? 'Journalists covers everything from Pulitzer Prize-winning war correspondents to tabloid scumbags, so unless you saw the segment, I don't think you know who or what they were.
Louis' laughing all the way to the bank. He doesn't give two flying *******s what anone on here thinks of him and his dead right.
It's not 'a little theory', it's an opinion. That man was the only vocal coach at the start of the season yet, lo and behold, a couple of weeks later, here's Evie back. Hmmm. He's not on the show a wet week and Louis has been getting away with speaking out of turn for years. There's no comparison.

One was the editor of the Irish NOTW, no? Or atleast involved with them.
No sweeping generalisations there, tabloid scum is tabloid scum.

I love how you think what you're saying is fact. That Savan's job is under threat, that he's not important to the show because Yvie was brought back ect ect.. It's just your feeble attempt to discredit anything positive Savan says about Cher.