About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Patrick · 08-01-2011, 05:52 PM

They have been engaged for a couple of weeks now and I don't think anyone on here really knows.

Nathan asked Rachael to be his wife just before New Years and of course she accepted and updated her Facebook status to 'engaged'.

This is basically a massive slap in the face to you bellends out there who said they were only together for the fame and attention, Big Brother 11 is long gone and both of them were out of the house very early, if they were really only together for fame why the hell are they still together and getting married when no magazine is interested?

It's weird thinking though that they weren't even a couple in the house, and the start of their relationship actually begun infront of our very eyes on Big Brother's Big Mouth.

Harry! · 08-01-2011, 05:54 PM

Poor Rachael, Nathan is horrible!

ILoveTRW · 08-01-2011, 06:09 PM

I had forgotten Nathan even existed lolz

Jords · 08-01-2011, 06:10 PM

More legit than the crap we get thrown at about JJ and Josie.

Jack_ · 08-01-2011, 06:11 PM

Lucky man...

-remembers the post that I was infracted for that I posted in a thread about these two before-

Patrick · 08-01-2011, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_

Lucky man...

-remembers the post that I was infracted for that I posted in a thread about these two before-

Locke. · 08-01-2011, 06:13 PM

Rachael is far too good for him (looks wise).. Surprised she hasn't turned into a regular in nuts actually.

MTVN · 08-01-2011, 06:29 PM

That's one hell of a monobrow he's got there

Legend killer · 08-01-2011, 06:33 PM

Racheal is mega hot stuff , but Nathan has to sort that eyebrow it is more bushy than my fuken armpit hair

zotler. · 08-01-2011, 06:37 PM

Never even knew they were dating, congratulations to them I suppose.

Lewis. · 08-01-2011, 06:38 PM

They can't be making megabucks if Nathan still shops in Primark (I have that t-shirt: £3 in Primark

)... fair play to them I say.

Stacey. · 08-01-2011, 06:39 PM

Rachael's too good for him.

Still congratulations to them though :')

Fetch The Bolt Cutters · 08-01-2011, 06:41 PM

nathan is vile

Suze · 08-01-2011, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick

They have been engaged for a couple of weeks now and I don't think anyone on here really knows.

Nathan asked Rachael to be his wife just before New Years and of course she accepted and updated her Facebook status to 'engaged'.

This is basically a massive slap in the face to you bellends out there who said they were only together for the fame and attention, Big Brother 11 is long gone and both of them were out of the house very early, if they were really only together for fame why the hell are they still together and getting married when no magazine is interested?

It's weird thinking though that they weren't even a couple in the house, and the start of their relationship actually begun infront of our very eyes on Big Brother's Big Mouth.

Nice of you to call members Bellends isn't it. As for those who said they were only in it for the fame, I haven't seen where that's been said? But then I have only been a member here a few months and can't be a**ed to go through the older threads. The only person I can remember stating Racheal especially was in BB for the fame of which he has been proved wrong, is that bellend, JJ1, who is a fame hungry **ore.

Good luck to Nathan and Rachael, a sort of unlikely couple, yet it seems to work

Patrick · 08-01-2011, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suze

Nice of you to call members Bellends isn't it. As for those who said they were only in it for the fame, I haven't seen where that's been said? But then I have only been a member here a few months and can't be a**ed to go through the older threads. The only person I can remember stating Racheal especially was in BB for the fame of which he has been proved wrong, is that bellend, JJ1, who is a fame hungry **ore.

Good luck to Nathan and Rachael, a sort of unlikely couple, yet it seems to work

Sorry but who are you and why are you telling me what I can and can't say?

But anyway, Yeah as you said you've only been here a few months, no one's asking you to go through the threads back to July and June but of course they were called fake, girls who are jealous of Rachael called it fake and alot of people said it was just for the magazines.

LemonJam · 08-01-2011, 07:09 PM

lol.

Suze · 08-01-2011, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick

Sorry but who are you and why are you telling me what I can and can't say?

But anyway, Yeah as you said you've only been here a few months, no one's asking you to go through the threads back to July and June but of course they were called fake, girls who are jealous of Rachael called it fake and alot of people said it was just for the magazines.

I have not told you what you can and can't say? And my name is Suze as in my profile here. I also know I haven't been asked to go through old threads, so not quite sure what you are on about

Lee. · 08-01-2011, 07:28 PM

I feel kind of cheated that we didn't get to see their love blossoming!!

seanraff07 · 08-01-2011, 07:37 PM

I didn't think they were doing it for attention or anything i just genuinely didn't think they would last as i think they're a bit of an odd couple.

Good luck to them though, i liked Nathan and Rachael.. well, i didn't really have enough time to judge her.

This reminds me.. are John and Josie still going out? Or was it false as i first thought?

Lee. · 08-01-2011, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanraff07

I didn't think they were doing it for attention or anything i just genuinely didn't think they would last as i think they're a bit of an odd couple.

Good luck to them though, i liked Nathan and Rachael.. well, i didn't really have enough time to judge her.

This reminds me.. are John and Josie still going out? Or was it false as i first thought?

Was just about to ask that.. I'm not too sure really