[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Angus58 barely mentioned any of the details of the case though. She didnt kill him, her friend did when he shoved the guy to the ground fracturing his skull.

This from BBC News: "Thomas screamed "******s" at Mr Baynham and his friend Philip Brown, the court heard.

When Mr Baynham confronted her, there was a scuffle during which she hit him with her handbag and he grabbed it.

Alexander, a student from Thornton Heath, south-east London, then ran up and knocked him to the ground, causing a severe brain injury as his head struck the pavement."

After that she started kicking him but that wasnt what killed him, and the Mail are just sensationalising the case by going on about him being "stamped to death" when he wasnt.

Dont get me wrong, it was a terrible crime and she deserves to be punished for it, but for the OP to say they only got a 2 and a half year sentance, and to completely ignore the fact that there were 2 others involved in the attack & that the girls kicks didnt kill him is just being misleading.

She kicked a helpless man repetadley whilst he lay there dying.

Much better.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

She kicked a helpless man repetadley whilst he lay there dying.

Much better.

Or if that bitter truth is too hard for some to swallow: she witnessed a man being kicked and jumped on, to the point that the injuries killed him and she felt it was worthy of boasting about after the event.

One sick bitch, along with her equally sick thug friends.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

She kicked a helpless man repetadley whilst he lay there dying.

Much better.

I'm not saying that but I was just pointing out that there were others involved (something the OP didnt mention) and it wasnt her kicking him that killed him (something else the OP didnt mention). I also dont think it so black and white that you should just slap a life sentence on anyone who takes part in a killing; there's a reason that the law makes a distinction between murder and manslaughter

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Or if that bitter truth is too hard for some to swallow: she witnessed a man being kicked and jumped on, to the point that the injuries killed him and she felt it was worthy of boasting about after the event.

One sick bitch, along with her equally sick thug friends.

Here's the Facebook conversations of the killers; http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/n...e_on_Facebook/

Extremely callous? yes. But boasting? I dont think thats an appropiate term

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

I'm not saying that but I was just pointing out that there were others involved (something the OP didnt mention) and it wasnt her kicking him that killed him (something else the OP didnt mention). I also dont think it so black and white that you should just slap a life sentence on anyone who takes part in a killing; there's a reason that the law makes a distinction between murder and manslaughter



Here's the Facebook conversations of the killers; http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/n...e_on_Facebook/

Extremely callous? yes. But boasting? I dont think thats an appropiate term

I'd say the way the FB conversation was going, they were pretty much amused about it all - as though they seemed quite pleased with themselves in their involvement and memory recall of the incident. If you don't, that's of course your opinion and I completely respect that.

Mine is that it certainly comes across as boasting in their own sick and warped way - I can understand why you don't think it's boasting - but I do see it as that.