[patsylimerick]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Yeah i suppose it is but it is three times larger than the sample size you incorrectly used, you cited the Bulger case, but only one of the offenders has re-offended.

However you appear to have overlooked the point I was making so let me make it again,

Firstly, did or did not one of the offenders in the Bulger case re-offend, despite attempts at rehabilitation? Where was I 'incorrect' in saying that?

I didn't overlook this point, I agree with it and I never said otherwise, did I?

I'm going to say it one last time. Someone said that this boy can be rehabilitated. I said that you cannot say one way or the other whether or not he can definitively be rehabilitated without being the person who assesses him and being appropriately qualified to do so. I also said that there are people who cannot be rehabilitated. I really cannot understand this forum. These seem to be fair points and yet people are coming over all indignant because I made them.