[Liberty4eva]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

Pascal didn't prescribe agnosticism. He said we should believe in God and obey his laws, if there is so little as a small chance he existed, we would have to worry about going to Hell otherwise.
It's not that Christians don't listen to evidence that contradicts their beliefs. It's just that they have no evidence to support their beliefs in the first place. Besides, what do you even mean that scientists are ignoring evidence? Isn't that a contradiction in terms?

Well inverting the relationship between the presence of CO2 and the earth's surface temperature hardly supports your case. I thought this was down to the burning of fossil fuels and the human/animal population taken in conjunction with the state of the rate of consumption of carbon dioxide by the world's plantlife.

I'm not concerned about what Pascal personally thought. I threw his name in just to highlight that similarly erroneous logic has been used centuries before.

There is uncertainty that God exists. You cannot disprove God exists so there will always be a level of uncertainty. You say there is no evidence God exists well what about the millions who have had near-death experiences saying that they saw dead relatives and a bright light? Some would call that eye-witness testimony.

If it makes it less confusing for you just ignore Pascal and let me say that I, Liberty4eva, am presenting this argument just like that guy in the video.

There is uncertainty that God exists. If we worship God when there is God, and so on and so on. The conclusion we derive from my argument is BS just like the conclusion the global warming video derives is BS.