[Omah]

Originally Posted by Jords

The process of nominating has always been kept the same, with the odd exception of a twist 1 week, it would be interesting to see how the HMs behave not knowing what the nomination process will be that week.

- knows people will want it kept the same, but still thinks it would make a great twist for a series instead of a stupid launch twist -

Some other nomination exceptions

Big Brother 2009

Week 3

Siavash, playing King Henry VIII in the week's task, was called upon to ban one housemate from nominating and to grant another immunity. He chose Charlie and Marcus respectively

Week 11

Siavash and Sophie both refused to nominate. As punishment Big Brother decided, without telling them, that the first two housemates with whom Siavash made physical contact and the first two that Sophie named after leaving the Diary Room would be deemed to be their nominations. Siavash touched Bea and Sophie, and Sophie named Rodrigo and Bea. Therefore Bea received an additional two nominations and Sophie and Rodrigo each received one extra nomination.

Big Brother 2008

Week 6

As Darnell was Head of House he was immune from nomination/eviction. Hell Housemates had to peel potatoes in order to nominate.


Week 7

As Dale was Head of House he could nominate but could not be nominated. Hell Housemates had to chop onions in order to nominate.

[Jords]

Originally Posted by Omah

Some other nomination exceptions

Yeah but theyre crap...

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Jords

Yeah but theyre crap...

You said "The process of nominating has always been kept the same" - regrettably, over the seasons, that has been increasingly less true - there has been far roo much fiddling about by BB, frequently to keep the "chosen ones" in the house .....