Quote:
Originally Posted by karl100589
The way I would do it:
Rather then the top 2 vote getters being up for nomination the top 5 vote getters are nominated
Save and Replace stays
Vote to SAVE!
|
Simple changes but I like, the 2-head evictions can get boring although BB11 didnt have many (BB10 was filled with them >.>)
Save + Replace, yes!
But I do like the concept of voting out who you dont like.. even though some characters are lost. Im wierd, I know some provide entertainment but they have to go if I cant stand them
Quote:
Originally Posted by MusicMan
I LOVE the idea of the crime-related, guilty/not guilty thing. It would a cool idea to have the one housemate up and people vote yes or no. Although they probably will get evicted. But yeah that night would need some other kind of event, like a housemate going in like you said, coz if no one gets evicted, the crowd are gonna feel slightly cheated...! 
|
Thanks MM! Welcome back btw

Yepp I thought that too, a new HM could go in regardless, or only goes in if the potential evictee is 'guilty' nahaha
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky.
I think if they are going to messa round with noms/whos up/changing the vote(eg. to vote to save)...then we should be told BEFOREHAND. Otherwise it just looks like they are making the decisions based on who is likely to go each week.
(Yes Im still bitter about them anouncing a quad eviction AFTER they knew josie got the pass to the final  )
|
Good idea, whoever is the host should tell the details of the following week at the end of the eviction show.. could be a discussion point on BBBM if its back also.