| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
All hail the Moyesiah
|
Quote:
The hierarchy of liability is: - a resident owner-occupier who owns either the leasehold or freehold of all or part of the property - a resident tenant - a resident who lives in the property and who is a licensee. This means that they are not a tenant, but have permission to stay there - any resident living in the property, for example, a squatter - an owner of the property where no one is resident So as you can see squatters do have to pay council tax, and even if for some reason they are not the homeowner is paying it whether there are people squatting or not so what's the big deal? And you want some examples of squatters contributing to the community, here's a couple: There's the famous St Agnes Place, a street which became one of Britain's most famous squats; over 30 years it grew into a large community offering social centres for the homeless as well as hostels and the place was visited by several artists and musicians including Bob Marley Also in Dalston squatters kept the properties in good condition, did repair work to the roof as well as general weatherproofing and internal maintenence to buildings that would otherwise have fallen into disrepair. But nah ****** them, better for them to be homeless and for streets to be filled with empty and derelict houses right |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|