[Jules2]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

What magazines?

Star 28.11.2011, they were said to be fuming. They were cross as they had bought the gifts and they accused her of playing a game in the house. It was at the BB Wrap party.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Jules2

Star 28.11.2011, they were said to be fuming. They were cross as they had bought the gifts and they accused her of playing a game in the house. It was at the BB Wrap party.

The wrap party was on the 14th, so the Star sat on this to print it yesterday. They were said to be fuming. Is the hear say or did it quote them? I am guessing the Star is a reputable mag in the UK.....

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

The wrap party was on the 14th, so the Star sat on this to print it yesterday. They were said to be fuming. Is the hear say or did it quote them? I am guessing the Star is a reputable mag in the UK.....

LOL. You didn't believe them, demanded the name of the mag. You were given the name of the mag, and are now disputing the reputation of said mag, want to know exactly how it was quoted, and why the delay in printing......


PMSL.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

LOL. You didn't believe them, demanded the name of the mag. You were given the name of the mag, and are now disputing the reputation of said mag, want to know exactly how it was quoted, and why the delay in printing......


PMSL.

What's funny is how you post comments off what you have heard instead of trying to find out facts. you have not even read the article yourself but have commented on it. Seeing how everything Jay does is scrutinized on this site I find it hard to believe a thread was not created yesterday with a picture of the article. So yes I will question it if I want to.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

What's funny is how you post comments off what you have heard instead of trying to find out facts. you have not even read the article yourself but have commented on it. Seeing how everything Jay does is scrutinized on this site I find it hard to believe a thread was not created yesterday with a picture of the article. So yes I will question it if I want to.

I didn't say you weren't allowed to question it.

I was highly amused that you were doing it and questioning every smallest detail as though you had a vested interest in it.

I'm not as bothered by the article as you are, thus I have no need to put someone through the 3rd degree about it.

If I was as determined as you appear to be to 'rubbish' the article, I'd be doing some research about it and the article myself, and not expect others to do my dirty work for me. Particulary in regards to 'why the mag 'sat' on the article'. May I suggest you contact the editor of Star mag, and put your questions to them: because unless the fm in question has direct involvment in the article/the mag: it's a question that they will not be able to answer.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I didn't say you weren't allowed to question it.

I was highly amused that you were doing it and questioning every smallest detail as though you had a vested interest in it.

I'm not as bothered by the article as you are, thus I have no need to put someone through the 3rd degree about it.

If I was as determined as you appear to be to 'rubbish' the article, I'd be doing some research about it and the article myself, and not expect others to do my dirty work for me. Particulary in regards to 'why the mag 'sat' on the article'. May I suggest you contact the editor of Star mag, and put your questions to them: because unless the fm in question has direct involvment in the article/the mag: it's a question that they will not be able to answer.

May I suggest you not reply to a question that was not asked to you in the first place since you have no vested interest.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

May I suggest you not reply to a question that was not asked to you in the first place since you have no vested interest.

No you may not.

Public forum and I am quite within my rights, quite entitled to add to the thread, using any previous comment.

If you want a one to one convo: I suggest you do that via PM.

[Jules2]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

What's funny is how you post comments off what you have heard instead of trying to find out facts. you have not even read the article yourself but have commented on it. Seeing how everything Jay does is scrutinized on this site I find it hard to believe a thread was not created yesterday with a picture of the article. So yes I will question it if I want to.

I personally wouldnt reproduce anything on a thread as I wouldnt want to find myself in trouble with copyright laws. Whilst we stand up for the ones we champion, we have to accept for each of them that things have been said, none of them are perfect. We ourselves cannot prove anything as we are only going by hearsay. We make up our own minds.

[Jules2]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

The wrap party was on the 14th, so the Star sat on this to print it yesterday. They were said to be fuming. Is the hear say or did it quote them? I am guessing the Star is a reputable mag in the UK.....

I cannot quote word for word as there are copyright laws. I daresay if you look for the piece on line you will find it and judge it for yourself. No matter who we like or understand, there are always others who will deny our own thoughts. It is up to everyone to make up their own minds tbh. I am only stating what was said.

I am not one for buying magazines tbh but I have noticed over the last years that they, along with the newspapers, do not follow BB as much as they used to. Bearing this in mind I do not find it unusual for them to sit on something which isnt such popular news as I am a Celebrity and the XFactor. They seem to be the two who are saturating the news.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Jules2

I cannot quote word for word as there are copyright laws. I daresay if you look for the piece on line you will find it and judge it for yourself. No matter who we like or understand, there are always others who will deny our own thoughts. It is up to everyone to make up their own minds tbh. I am only stating what was said.

I am not one for buying magazines tbh but I have noticed over the last years that they, along with the newspapers, do not follow BB as much as they used to. Bearing this in mind I do not find it unusual for them to sit on something which isnt such popular news as I am a Celebrity and the XFactor. They seem to be the two who are saturating the news.

I looked online and couldn't find it. I never asked for word for word. I was simply asking if it quoted them saying this or if the magazine was the one saying it. A lot of times they will run a quote and then add in what they want at the end (outside the quote) so people are fooled to believing it came from that person.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

I looked online and couldn't find it. I never asked for word for word. I was simply asking if it quoted them saying this or if the magazine was the one saying it. A lot of times they will run a quote and then add in what they want at the end (outside the quote) so people are fooled to believing it came from that person.

So you are basically saying that the fm in question is being dishonest and cannot be trusted? Surely that's a wee bit 'off'.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

So you are basically saying that the fm in question is being dishonest and cannot be trusted? Surely that's a wee bit 'off'.

Umm no I think he's asking for the source so he can clarify what was said for himself, it's a very reasonable request and I don't know why you have such an issue with it

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Umm no I think he's asking for the source so he can clarify what was said for himself, it's a very reasonable request and I don't know why you have such an issue with it

I have as much issue with it as that same poster has with doubting another fm - which is equally as reasonable.

[claire2012]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

So you are basically saying that the fm in question is being dishonest and cannot be trusted? Surely that's a wee bit 'off'.

i disagree with everything you are saying Pyramid. Imo you read things the way you want to, but its not always the correct way!! you make out people have said things they havent. At the end of they day this was all caused by ALEX!!!! she was the greedy 1 who went back on her deal.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by claire2012

i disagree with everything you are saying Pyramid. Imo you read things the way you want to, but its not always the correct way!! you make out people have said things they havent. At the end of they day this was all caused by ALEX!!!! she was the greedy 1 who went back on her deal.

New member bumps a 6 month old thread!

Hello Claire2012.

I can't believe someone still actually gives a damn about who shared what at this stage of the game. Disagree all you want: that's entirely your perogative.

People have moved on.... there's a new BB just waiting in the wings. Stick around for that one - it'll be fun.