[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

May I suggest you not reply to a question that was not asked to you in the first place since you have no vested interest.

No you may not.

Public forum and I am quite within my rights, quite entitled to add to the thread, using any previous comment.

If you want a one to one convo: I suggest you do that via PM.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

No you may not.

Public forum and I am quite within my rights, quite entitled to add to the thread, using any previous comment.

If you want a one to one convo: I suggest you do that via PM.

Don't care to talk to you at all much less one on one.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

Don't care to talk to you at all much less one on one.

I wasn't referring to me.

I was referring to the fm that you are putting through the 3rd degree, with questions that you know they most likely are not in a position to answer.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I wasn't referring to me.

I was referring to the fm that you are putting through the 3rd degree, with questions that you know they most likely are not in a position to answer.

Can't you just quit making **** up and go away?

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

Can't you just quit making **** up and go away?

Ermmmm..... how about a very firm

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I wasn't referring to me.

I was referring to the fm that you are putting through the 3rd degree, with questions that you know they most likely are not in a position to answer.

There was a statement I made at the beginning, no question. Then there was a question that could be answered by the poster. If it was a quote they will put these "" at the beginning and end of the quote. Then I followed up with another statement, again no question. So I asked one question and you qualify that as putting someone through the "3rd degree." I would disagree with you again as well as most posters on here.

And I suppose you are one of the ones that said Louise is thick.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

There was a statement I made at the beginning, no question. Then there was a question that could be answered by the poster. If it was a quote they will put these "" at the beginning and end of the quote. Then I followed up with another statement, again no question. So I asked one question and you qualify that as putting someone through the "3rd degree." I would disagree with you again as well as most posters on here.

And I suppose you are one of the ones that said Louise is thick.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBfan6418
Don't care to talk to you at all much less one on one.

Thought you didn't care to talk to me?

You simply did not like the fact that I challenged you, and in a way in you could offer no reasonable reply.

You ask for info, and you were given it. When you were the info you requested, you then attempted to dismiss and/or question that - but are unable to disupute it with anything solid other than your own opinion - despite having been given info that has been published, where and when - rather than just another fm's opinion. If you were so keen to prove your own point, you would be doing your own homework.

Perhaps you have done your homework, and are unable to find something to back up your own thoughts - particularly when another fm has given you the info re the mag, what the comments were, the date of publication of said mag etc is.

As for Louise and her being thick: this thread is about Alex, her splitting the money (or not as the case may be), and some of the housemates reaction to that... and laterly, that being Jay and Louise. let's try to stay on topic eh.

[Jules2]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

There was a statement I made at the beginning, no question. Then there was a question that could be answered by the poster. If it was a quote they will put these "" at the beginning and end of the quote. Then I followed up with another statement, again no question. So I asked one question and you qualify that as putting someone through the "3rd degree." I would disagree with you again as well as most posters on here.

And I suppose you are one of the ones that said Louise is thick.

Ok folks, listen I dont mind being asked the question (what does fm stand for Pyramid please, so many different sayings I am just catching up on it all I think lol).

Now I have had a look for the Star magazine 28/11/2011, I havent got time to go right into it but I would confirm that I did find the Star 21/11/2011 on line a few days ago. I wanted to confirm an interview with Aaron and Faye, was pleased that I found it. Bearing this in mind I have no doubt that the 28th will be there at some time or another. Am never sure how these things work tbh.

I have had another look at my own magazine and the piece says "according to our source........". We therefore have to ask ourselves where did the source get it from? I am well aware of how things can be misinterpreted but my main point in putting this forward, was to do with the issue of the money and the fact that for Jay to get all he thinks he is due, the first part of the agreement has to be resolved. Until this is done then there is no reason at all why the second part should be undertaken. Bearing all of this in mind, perhaps it is better that they all keep to their own little bits of money. I would think that each of them will have gained far more outside of the house than in it.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Jules2

Ok folks, listen I dont mind being asked the question (what does fm stand for Pyramid please, so many different sayings I am just catching up on it all I think lol).

Now I have had a look for the Star magazine 28/11/2011, I havent got time to go right into it but I would confirm that I did find the Star 21/11/2011 on line a few days ago. I wanted to confirm an interview with Aaron and Faye, was pleased that I found it. Bearing this in mind I have no doubt that the 28th will be there at some time or another. Am never sure how these things work tbh.

I have had another look at my own magazine and the piece says "according to our source........". We therefore have to ask ourselves where did the source get it from? I am well aware of how things can be misinterpreted but my main point in putting this forward, was to do with the issue of the money and the fact that for Jay to get all he thinks he is due, the first part of the agreement has to be resolved. Until this is done then there is no reason at all why the second part should be undertaken. Bearing all of this in mind, perhaps it is better that they all keep to their own little bits of money. I would think that each of them will have gained far more outside of the house than in it.

Exactly what I thought. Thanks.