[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

LOL. You didn't believe them, demanded the name of the mag. You were given the name of the mag, and are now disputing the reputation of said mag, want to know exactly how it was quoted, and why the delay in printing......


PMSL.

What's funny is how you post comments off what you have heard instead of trying to find out facts. you have not even read the article yourself but have commented on it. Seeing how everything Jay does is scrutinized on this site I find it hard to believe a thread was not created yesterday with a picture of the article. So yes I will question it if I want to.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

What's funny is how you post comments off what you have heard instead of trying to find out facts. you have not even read the article yourself but have commented on it. Seeing how everything Jay does is scrutinized on this site I find it hard to believe a thread was not created yesterday with a picture of the article. So yes I will question it if I want to.

I didn't say you weren't allowed to question it.

I was highly amused that you were doing it and questioning every smallest detail as though you had a vested interest in it.

I'm not as bothered by the article as you are, thus I have no need to put someone through the 3rd degree about it.

If I was as determined as you appear to be to 'rubbish' the article, I'd be doing some research about it and the article myself, and not expect others to do my dirty work for me. Particulary in regards to 'why the mag 'sat' on the article'. May I suggest you contact the editor of Star mag, and put your questions to them: because unless the fm in question has direct involvment in the article/the mag: it's a question that they will not be able to answer.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I didn't say you weren't allowed to question it.

I was highly amused that you were doing it and questioning every smallest detail as though you had a vested interest in it.

I'm not as bothered by the article as you are, thus I have no need to put someone through the 3rd degree about it.

If I was as determined as you appear to be to 'rubbish' the article, I'd be doing some research about it and the article myself, and not expect others to do my dirty work for me. Particulary in regards to 'why the mag 'sat' on the article'. May I suggest you contact the editor of Star mag, and put your questions to them: because unless the fm in question has direct involvment in the article/the mag: it's a question that they will not be able to answer.

May I suggest you not reply to a question that was not asked to you in the first place since you have no vested interest.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

May I suggest you not reply to a question that was not asked to you in the first place since you have no vested interest.

No you may not.

Public forum and I am quite within my rights, quite entitled to add to the thread, using any previous comment.

If you want a one to one convo: I suggest you do that via PM.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

No you may not.

Public forum and I am quite within my rights, quite entitled to add to the thread, using any previous comment.

If you want a one to one convo: I suggest you do that via PM.

Don't care to talk to you at all much less one on one.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

Don't care to talk to you at all much less one on one.

I wasn't referring to me.

I was referring to the fm that you are putting through the 3rd degree, with questions that you know they most likely are not in a position to answer.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I wasn't referring to me.

I was referring to the fm that you are putting through the 3rd degree, with questions that you know they most likely are not in a position to answer.

Can't you just quit making **** up and go away?

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I wasn't referring to me.

I was referring to the fm that you are putting through the 3rd degree, with questions that you know they most likely are not in a position to answer.

There was a statement I made at the beginning, no question. Then there was a question that could be answered by the poster. If it was a quote they will put these "" at the beginning and end of the quote. Then I followed up with another statement, again no question. So I asked one question and you qualify that as putting someone through the "3rd degree." I would disagree with you again as well as most posters on here.

And I suppose you are one of the ones that said Louise is thick.

[Jules2]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

What's funny is how you post comments off what you have heard instead of trying to find out facts. you have not even read the article yourself but have commented on it. Seeing how everything Jay does is scrutinized on this site I find it hard to believe a thread was not created yesterday with a picture of the article. So yes I will question it if I want to.

I personally wouldnt reproduce anything on a thread as I wouldnt want to find myself in trouble with copyright laws. Whilst we stand up for the ones we champion, we have to accept for each of them that things have been said, none of them are perfect. We ourselves cannot prove anything as we are only going by hearsay. We make up our own minds.