Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-05-2012, 12:11 PM #1
Pyramid* Pyramid* is offline
Pyramid*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,528


Pyramid* Pyramid* is offline
Pyramid*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,528


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kizzy View Post
I saw that woman on the news, 44! she looked like a leather handbag...Bahahahahaha
she didn't look like any of my leather handbags I'll have you know!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
I'll all for freedom of choice but 5 is excessively young and I don't think they're in any capable state of making a rational decision.

18 is too old, but 5 is too young. I'd probably say 13 is an acceptable requirement.
You think a 13 year old child is able to understand and fully comprehend the level of damage that sunbeds/tanning does to the skin? You seriously believe a 13 year old child fully absorbs and comprehends the long term effects? If they say they do understand but still go on them anyway - that's proof that they have no understanding.

A child is not responsible enough to make a decision such as that,for damage that may not show until decades later.
Pyramid* is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 12:21 PM #2
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramid* View Post
You think a 13 year old child is able to understand and fully comprehend the level of damage that sunbeds/tanning does to the skin? You seriously believe a 13 year old child fully absorbs and comprehends the long term effects? If they say they do understand but still go on them anyway - that's proof that they have no understanding.

A child is not responsible enough to make a decision such as that,for damage that may not show until decades later.
Well I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly knew how much damage it does aged 13, I wasn't stupid. And so did most people I know.

So either I'm more intelligent than most 13 year olds, or you don't really have much faith in them, or the education that they receive.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 12:34 PM #3
Pyramid* Pyramid* is offline
Pyramid*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,528


Pyramid* Pyramid* is offline
Pyramid*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,528


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Well I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly knew how much damage it does aged 13, I wasn't stupid. And so did most people I know.

So either I'm more intelligent than most 13 year olds, or you don't really have much faith in them, or the education that they receive.
You base all 13 years olds on yourself then? That's quite some thought process there Jack.

Correct; you don't know about anyone else - and again correct: 'most of the people YOU know' does not equate to a sweeping generalisation of all 13 year olds. Also: females tend to use sunbeds, and teenage females in far higher proportion to male teenagers.
Pyramid* is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
charged, daughter, mother, tanning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts