[smeagol]

Originally Posted by Trasadkel1

There is something v strange about the editing of last nights footage that just didn't tie up or make sense to me. On watching the highlights you would possibly think that both Deana and Adam were overreacting to the events...Adam in that she mentioned his name with regard to noms and Deana rather strange overreaction in the garden in her chat with Luke A and her upset in the diary room. It all seemed rather extreme and over the top from both sides.
However it makes a lot more sense when combined with the fact that Deana was supposedly given a warning for calling Adam a derogatory name. It would explain why he felt upset and betrayed and would also explain why Deana was in tears and mentioned that she was ashamed and upset with herself and that she couldn't walk out with her head held high. Are BB trying to avoid another controversy hence why they have not shown what really happened. When thought of in this context the whole scenario makes a lot more sense.

that was ages ago its old news nothing to do with last night

[Trasadkel1]

Originally Posted by smeagol

that was ages ago its old news nothing to do with last night

????. It was in yesterday's paper 17th July..old news???. This would have tied in with events from the night before which were shown last night.

[smeagol]

Originally Posted by Trasadkel1

????. It was in yesterday's paper 17th July..old news???. This would have tied in with events from the night before which were shown last night.

i read it days ago i i was suprised it wasn't posted here. so isnt recent. they are always digging up stuff. its the star lol. they had something else the other week that wasn't posted here about someone else doing something.

[Trasadkel1]

Originally Posted by smeagol

i read it days ago i i was suprised it wasn't posted here. so isnt recent. they are always digging up stuff. its the star lol. they had something else the other week that wasn't posted here about someone else doing something.

Yes it's the Star who are owned by Richard Desmond who owns Channel 5 and it was in yesterday's Daily Star with regard events that happened on Monday night. Why would he skew the articles on his own programme. Let's be honest the highlights of last nights events just didn't make sense. Deana would not have been that upset and said the things she did just over mentioning Adams name with reference to talking about noms.

[smeagol]

Originally Posted by Trasadkel1

Yes it's the Star who are owned by Richard Desmond who owns Channel 5 and it was in yesterday's Daily Star with regard events that happened on Monday night. Why would he skew the articles on his own programme. Let's be honest the highlights of last nights events just didn't make sense. Deana would not have been that upset and said the things she did just over mentioning Adams name with reference to talking about noms.

theres some full you tube clips that explain better. they just done a poor job of editing it. as usual