[tonysoprano0316]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

As I pointed out - lets not dress it up - obviously if you're talking to a female on Skype then she's not a prostitute but is that all that's happening here? It'd have to be one hell of a chat for me to give her a 170 grand necklace. She is aware of what she's doing and must realise what people are going to think. If the blokes are dumb enough to give her money to 'chat' then if thats fine by her then I certainly dont have any complaints. But, bottom line she's selling her 'time' for money.

As I said, there are a lot of lonely rich blokes in the world who (clearly) wouldn't think twice about splashing out.

It's obviously a fetish, the man with no self esteem but a large bank account is given an ego-boost by chatting to a pretty girl who normally wouldn't give him the time of day.

I imagine when she is bought a gift, she then gushes and thanks the bloke on the other end of the webcam for being "such a nice, generous guy".

Yes, she may be selling time, but until she is selling sex she's not a prostitute.

If there is no evidence to suggest she is stripping for these men on webcam, let alone sleeping with them then it is unfair to label her as such, and it is the height of hypocrisy for someone like Jasmine to label ANYONE a prostitute when you take into account how she makes her living.