[alex_front2]

Originally Posted by Angus

What on earth is the problem? If men AND women are happy to be parted with their hard earned cash and are over the age of consent, it's nowt to do with anyone else. Who knows what it is that Danica "offers", and who, indeed, gives a sh*t?


And what of the men who use prostitutes or women who use gigolos? They have to be the saddest idiots of all, having to pay for it, and then having the audacity to think they are somehow morally better than the people they use. It takes two to tango.

1) I think this sort of thing is the tip of the iceberg into prostitution. As I've said numerous times here, this rinsing thing is wrong. Doing it to men is appalling but I can see how a pretty face and big boobs can make men empty their wallets. I just can't see women being so stupid or spell-bound by her. Women - lesbian I presume - just aren't that easily persuaded imo by a nice big pair of tits and a warm smile. There is something sinister going on with this and I don't buy this whole 'men and women reward me for my web cam' spiel. I can't believe this little strumpet is happy to accept gifting from women too knowing she has zero interest in them. She is not gay or bisexual so why do this? At least stick to men who may have a chance. She's conning women more than men and using the fact that she rinses women to make what she's doing somehow seem less sleazy.

2) I think the prostitutes are sadder than the 'clients'. Clients are often successful men just looking for extra fun with more money than sense. Allegedly Wayne Rooney used them. He's on £220K a week with an OK looking wife (not beautiful I admit) and a kid. He's not exactly some pathetic loner. Then there's his former team mate Christiano Ronaldo who apparently paid women for their *time*. Not exactly a desperado. Then you have the City executives and traders blowing their bonuses etc.