Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia
Well... yes. They are biased toward the area they actually work in or what would be the point? Jack implied it was all a scam, all getting in bed together... it's not like that at all. Anyway, that's not the topic here, is it. I only addressed it because Jack raised it. If you want to talk about MPs, this is the wrong thread.
I'm sure you would agree with Jack.
It's far from unworkable, and it is not underhanded to look at information that is accessible by any member of the public with an internet connection. They're not hacking into accounts, they're not following them on a night out, all they're doing is looking at stuff they have posted for the world to see. It's funny how people on here actually involved in recruiting staff and know the many pitfalls think there's nothing wrong with this.
|
You suggested jack was not experienced enough to comment on the subject, he countered with MP's are not experienced in the fields they make decisions in , neither are their advisors.
Which is true.
You then suggested they are biased, which would imply they are in bed together. That is true.
I did not raise MP's into this debate, jack did to reinforce his point.
Why are you
sure I would agree with jack?
Once again I don't see how looking at a social media page can give accurate insight into the persona of a candidate.
You don't have to be in recruiting to ponder this surely?