Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy
It was a good point and well made actually, there are lots of people who make important decisions about all kinds of things but that analogy was apt.
They have said all they want to say in favour of this yes, but to have a debate you need two sides livia.
What about the points against, do they not deserve equal attention?
|
Making ill-informed comments about MPs is not a good analogy, it's lashing out because you've nothing valid to say on the subject and so turn every argument around so you can moan about the government. You obviously know as much about MPs and their advisors as Jack does.
I understand what a debate is, Kizzy. I also understand what an argument is. There is a big difference. I think I have made my position very clear and posting the same thing backwards and forwards is not a debate Kizzy. So therefore I respectfully refer you to all my recent posts. They make my position quite clear and banging on about it for another ten exchanges isn't going to change that.