| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
It won't though. As has been said countless times, you'd have to be pretty thick to buy cigarettes because of what the packets look like. If scaring people into quitting through the use of vastly exaggerated pictures was an effective deterrent then it would've worked by now. They just need to concede that people aren't buying it and drop it already.
I smoke for a mixture of reasons but one of them certainly isn't because the packets look 'pretty', not that they're not already permeated with warnings across half the packet.
__________________
![]() ![]() Kentucky-Fried Goose. Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers. London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured. Last edited by Redway; 30-05-2013 at 03:34 PM. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|