|
oh fack off
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
|
|
oh fack off
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
Seriously though, Sam's a really nice guy and someone that I'd probably be friends with and go for a drink with on the outside, and was also in the right during the little disagreement he had with Dexter (that I will admit, I'm not blinded by my support for certain housemates, I'm still capable of being objective)...but why all of a sudden so you all think he should win? He'd be an appalling winner, he has contributed nothing to this series...like literally nothing. It's not real life, it's an entertainment TV show, for him to walk off with £100k and effectively the title of the best housemate of this series (of which he categorically is not, that's indisputable) would be an absolute joke
Crowning dullards winners just encourages housemates to do **** all. If I went in knowing that they've now reverted back to vote to evict it's certainly something I'd consider, I mean it's a foolproof gameplan to guarantee yourself a place in the final and perhaps a shot at winning thanks to the dullard worshippers. And that's totally counter productive, being encouraged to offer nothing and say nothing is the last thing housemates should be encouraged to do, yet by supporting such bores and giving them the win that's all that is happening
He's a perfectly nice guy and was in the right but seriously, that doesn't mean after eight weeks of doing piss all for the show he should win. No way.
|