[Lee.]

But the suggested series of events aren't logical kizzy. Surely you don't agree with the theory that PC whateverhisnameis came up with? It doesn't make sense?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Lee.

But the suggested series of events aren't logical kizzy. Surely you don't agree with the theory that PC whateverhisnameis came up with? It doesn't make sense?

I don't know who PC whateverhisnameis is lee, so it's hard to say.
In many cases those related to or closely associated with missing children are implicated, so the feeling that this may be the case here is not altogether illogical is it in fairness?

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I don't know who PC whateverhisnameis is lee, so it's hard to say.
In many cases those related to or closely associated with missing children are implicated, so the feeling that this may be the case here is not altogether illogical is it in fairness?

To me it is.. None of it makes sense. I think the McCanns are right in suing PC whateverhisnameis for defamation (sorry I cba looking up his name) and I really hope they win their case against him next month .

I also hope that if they do, something is also done about these dreadful websites where people are allowed to make completely unfounded allegations. I find them very distasteful and it must be very upsetting for the McCanns and their families.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Lee.

To me it is.. None of it makes sense. I think the McCanns are right in suing PC whateverhisnameis for defamation (sorry I cba looking up his name) and I really hope they win their case against him next month .

I also hope that if they do, something is also done about these dreadful websites where people are allowed to make completely unfounded allegations. I find them very distasteful and it must be very upsetting for the McCanns and their families.

I doubt very much they will lose the case, this is the 4th case they have spent the search fund money on and to date 3 fails and this will be the 4th ,truth will out