[Livia]

Originally Posted by the truth

This was not the question asked. I think this is a reply deliberately designed to derail the topic.

My reply was in answer to you question. She was not on trial. On what grounds would you suggest the BBC try to get rid of her? On the say so of some people accused of stealing from her?

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Livia

My reply was in answer to you question. She was not on trial. On what grounds would you suggest the BBC try to get rid of her? On the say so of some people accused of stealing from her?

Its not just on their say so as you well know

[Livia]

Originally Posted by the truth

Its not just on their say so as you well know

What evidence are you referring to then?

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Livia

What evidence are you referring to then?

don't you know? Im amazed you don't know when you have derailed the thread as though you seem to know all the answers? clearly you dont

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Livia

My reply was in answer to you question. She was not on trial. On what grounds would you suggest the BBC try to get rid of her? On the say so of some people accused of stealing from her?

people have been sacked before who are not on trial....sullied by the vile crimes and misbehaviours. Heck Russell brand was bombed for a crass joke that backfired