Quote:
Originally Posted by optimisticcynic
Dappy could extend that sense of nobility to the belief that the female sex is a more precious and morally pure gender than males and thus, their sexual conduct is expected to reflect this. But that would be misogynistic. When is it permissible to reject implications of current/modern political correctness? I struggle with aspects as well so this is no assault SM, but it does befuddle me at times as to how we attack others, oblivious to the implications of what we ourselves do and say everyday. I open doors for women and let them sit if I'm standing, but am always aware of what I'm ultimately suggesting and would think they were right if they did bollock me for being a rude arse.
|
I understand the concept you are arguing mate and I have been conflicted with this on occasion too.
The way I see it now is it's just good manners and noble for me to open doors for women or let them have your seat on a bus. Ok you might get the odd woman have a go and call you a chauvinist (never happened to me personally) but I think the vast majority of women will see it for what it is which is good decorum and virtue. Don't you ever get women tell you that not enough men are like this nowadays?
I personally have no problem with the rule of never hitting a woman mostly for the reasons Niamh has elegantly put forward. We may strive for equality between the sexes and that's great but ultimately there will still be physical discrepancies between the genders and that's the way I look at it now mate.