[jet]

[QUOTE=Seraphim;6632016]Who says? I recently read an anger management book written by a prominent psychologist which advocated these very techniques for dealing with anger. It said that research has shown that bottling up rage does not lead to an explosion and that in fact the best way to handle it is to allow it to dissipate naturally.


Newly fangled nonsense.

[the truth]

[QUOTE=jet;6632178]

Originally Posted by Seraphim

Who says? I recently read an anger management book written by a prominent psychologist which advocated these very techniques for dealing with anger. It said that research has shown that bottling up rage does not lead to an explosion and that in fact the best way to handle it is to allow it to dissipate naturally.


Newly fangled nonsense.

agreed , its utter tripe. if everyone argued about every tiny little thing the nationa and world would be in 1000 times bigger mess than its already in. a bigger person has to often rise about petty difference. if only bitter twats like linda could

[Seraphim]

[QUOTE=the truth;6632184]

Originally Posted by jet

agreed , its utter tripe. if everyone argued about every tiny little thing the nationa and world would be in 1000 times bigger mess than its already in. a bigger person has to often rise about petty difference. if only bitter twats like linda could

You are being contradictory if you are agreeing with Jet. The book to which I was referring advocated a variety of techniques to deal with anger, but having an argument was not one of them.

[jet]

[QUOTE=Seraphim;6632277]

Originally Posted by the truth

You are being contradictory if you are agreeing with Jet. The book to which I was referring advocated a variety of techniques to deal with anger, but having an argument was not one of them.

Where did I say having an argument was? Quote, please?

[Seraphim]

[QUOTE=jet;6632178]

Originally Posted by Seraphim

Who says? I recently read an anger management book written by a prominent psychologist which advocated these very techniques for dealing with anger. It said that research has shown that bottling up rage does not lead to an explosion and that in fact the best way to handle it is to allow it to dissipate naturally.


Newly fangled nonsense.

It made sense to me. I don't have big anger issues, but inevitably I have had to deal with people who have. I've found that trying to resolve matters just makes them worse. It's definitely better to simply remove oneself from a situation and give them time to cool off.

[jet]

[QUOTE=Seraphim;6632298]

Originally Posted by jet

It made sense to me. I don't have a big anger issues, but inevitably I have had to deal with people who have. I've found that trying to resolve matters just makes them worse. It's definitely better to simply remove oneself from a situation and give the anger time to dissipate.

I too deal with people with anger issues and I don't agree. If a person CAN remove themselves permanently then it makes sense, but how often do people have that luxury?

[Seraphim]

[QUOTE=jet;6632358]

Originally Posted by Seraphim

I too deal with people with anger issues and I don't agree. If a person CAN remove themselves permanently then it makes sense, but how often do people have that luxury?

They don't need to remove themselves permanently. Everyone is different - some people just need a short time to get over anger, while others need longer, like a day or two. Linda Nolan obviously needs a lifetime, since she's still furious over an incident which took place twenty years ago.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

[QUOTE=Seraphim;6632439]

Originally Posted by jet

They don't need to remove themselves permanently. Everyone is different - some people just need a short time to get over anger, while others need longer, like a day or two. Linda Nolan obviously needs a lifetime, since she's still furious over an incident which took place twenty years ago.

[Kazanne]

[QUOTE=Vanessa;6632442]

Originally Posted by Seraphim

Youtube video