[the truth]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

TBH Judi makes good point. Jim is a known sexist, he admits it yet the women failed to out him. Ironically their attempt to get him to show this side only made him more popular.

wrong. hes not a known anything. hes a comedian and he has done nothing sexist at all in the house. as for outside well, hes been slandered against and falsely accused. even after the show and during the slanderous lies continue. no evidence for any of it as its all slanderous lies. judy james shouldnt be saying this, she displays enormous bias and ,ale hate here...shes is yet another biased man hater and a total hypocrite

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by the truth

wrong. hes not a known anything. hes a comedian and he has done nothing sexist at all in the house. as for outside well, hes been slandered against and falsely accused. even after the show and during the slanderous lies continue. no evidence for any of it as its all slanderous lies. judy james shouldnt be saying this, she displays enormous bias and ,ale hate here...shes is yet another biased man hater and a total hypocrite

I have heard stories about Jim Davidson since the 1980's. There are well documented incidents and if only half of those are true then he's a definite sexist and misogynist. I didnt bring this knowledge into my judgments of him cuz I think he's been a great HM but for you to try and brush his past under the carpet as if it was all lies is laughable. IF you;re trying to make a point about sexism then you've made that point but we all know what kind of person Jim Davidson is and if you dont want to acknowledge that then that is entirely up to you but I'm stating the things I am fairly sure about with Jim Davidson and I know for sure I'm NOT wrong.

[Beastie]

I love Judy James. There was no sexist comments. She's a brilliant psychologist and the best on the show. All hail Dame Judy James

[the truth]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

I have heard stories about Jim Davidson since the 1980's. There are well documented incidents and if only half of those are true then he's definite sexist and misogynist. I didnt bring this knowledge into my judgments of him cuz I think he's been a great HM but for you to try and brush his past under the carpet as if it was all lies is laughable. IF you;re trying to make a point about sexism then you've made that point but we all know what kind of person Jim Davidson is and if you dont want to acknowledge that then that is entirely up to you but I'm stating the things I am fairly sure about with Jim Davidson so I know for sure I'm NOT wrong.

dont pretend you know anything ....whats he been charged with? do you know all the specific detail of the allegation youve made? no of course not

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Beastie

I love Judy James. There was no sexist comments. She's a brilliant psychologist and the best on the show. All hail Dame Judy James

she has proved herself to be biased and sexist. she is meant to be impartial ....by revealing her enormous bias all her analysis has lost all credibility

[Pincho Paxton]

Linda wasn't well, probably still isn't. To side with someone who is ill is an emotional response, a shared empathy between a group of people. Judi James is supposed to be immune to an empathic response due to her work. She should see right through it. The fact is that she can't analyse herself. The first thing she should improve on is analysing herself.

[Lozzibear]

I think she always talks s*** so just ignore her.

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by the truth

dont pretend you know anything ....whats he been charged with? do you know all the specific detail of the allegation youve made? no of course not

What are you on about? What allegations have I made? If you want a dialogue then please note what I say and make your response relevant.

Let me explain, I have made no allegation but I have heard a hell of a lot of stories and read a hell of a lot of articles in the paper with a very conservative estimate of half of those being true - then I have a great idea of what Jim Davidson is like plus his persona on screen is consistent with what I've read. I met him once in the 1980 and his persona was consistent then too.

There is no need to reply cuz I dont think you really have anything to say. I dont have proof , I dont ne4ed it this is not a court of law but I've heard a hell of a lot of thing s and I've read a hell of a lot of things and what I see on Tv is consistent with that. I dont need any more than that to state my opinion

Do you wish to discuss the other part of my post or are you gonnas skate over that bit?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

What are you on about? What allegations have I made? If you want a dialogue then please note what I say and make your response relevant.

Let me explain, I have made no allegation but I have heard a hell of a lot of stories and read a hell of a lot of articles in the paper with a very conservative estimate of half of those being true - then I have a great idea of what Jim Davidson is like plus his persona on screen is consistent with what I've read. I met him once in the 1980 and his persona was consistent then too.

There is no need to reply cuz I dont think you really have anything to say. I dont have proof , I dont ne4ed it this is not a court of law but I've heard a hell of a lot of thing s and I've read a hell of a lot of things and what I see on Tv is consistent with that. I dont need any more than that to state my opinion

Do you wish to discuss the other part of my post or are you gonnas skate over that bit?

[the truth]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

What are you on about? What allegations have I made? If you want a dialogue then please note what I say and make your response relevant.

Let me explain, I have made no allegation but I have heard a hell of a lot of stories and read a hell of a lot of articles in the paper with a very conservative estimate of half of those being true - then I have a great idea of what Jim Davidson is like plus his persona on screen is consistent with what I've read. I met him once in the 1980 and his persona was consistent then too.

There is no need to reply cuz I dont think you really have anything to say. I dont have proof , I dont ne4ed it this is not a court of law but I've heard a hell of a lot of thing s and I've read a hell of a lot of things and what I see on Tv is consistent with that. I dont need any more than that to state my opinion

Do you wish to discuss the other part of my post or are you gonnas skate over that bit?

so youre making endless assumptions and labelling jim depsite knowing nothing of the specifics and depsite the fact no charges were ever made. pretty judgemental that. as for judy james not only is she anti jim , but she is openly biased for the women, the term we could have won the battle is a disgrace for a supposedly professional obective analyst

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by the truth

so youre making endless assumptions and labelling jim depsite knowing nothing of the specifics and depsite the fact no charges were ever made. pretty judgemental that. as for judy james not only is she anti jim , but she is openly biased for the women, the term we could have won the battle is a disgrace for a supposedly professional obective analyst

Can you read or do you deliberately choose not to? Please point out all the allegations I make.

[GiRTh]

OK I'll do it for you, he himself says he's a chauvinist and a sexist.

[AnnieK]

A lot of what people know about Jim have come from Jim - to ignore the fact that he himself calls himself a chauvinist is a little blinkered.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

A lot of what people know about Jim have come from Jim - to ignore the fact that he himself calls himself a chauvinist is a little blinkered.

its self deprecating humour....dont you get that?

[Apple202]

so what did she do that was actually sexist other than support a woman over a man

[Apple202]

which fyi isn't sexist

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

Can you read or do you deliberately choose not to? Please point out all the allegations I make.

Honestly don't waste your time all you will get is bombarded with question after question even when I and others can probably see you have given brilliant and in depth responses.

This isn't a court for god sakes so don't let someone feel like you're in the box standing trial lol.

[anne666]

The Daily Star is almost automatically dismissed as tripe on here and on a regular basis. Yet because this now involves Linda Nolan, to some , it's her fault! Get real please.
As far as the so called expert is concerned, the OP's outrageous, "Out to destroy the male character", is a totally false statement.

[Northern Monkey]

I thought everybody knew that Judi James talks bollocks most of the time?Who even listens to her?lol

[Pincho Paxton]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

I thought everybody knew that Judi James talks bollocks most of the time?Who even listens to her?lol

Until this series she was good... what happened?

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton

Until this series she was good... what happened?

She was allways good, she changed last summer when she entered the BB task for the play/pause task with Rylan and I noticed the next day she was on she had turned into someone totally different.

She went from judging a housemates behaviour to sometimes making catty comments and her ego definitely got bigger.

Sad really seeing as shes been a part of the show for about 12 years I think.

[anne666]

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton

Until this series she was good... what happened?

Doesn't that depend on, if one is or is not a fan of whoever she views in a negative light?

[Pincho Paxton]

Originally Posted by anne666

Doesn't that depend on if one is or is not a fan of whoever she views, in a negative light?

No, I base it on her noticing things that I didn't notice in past years.

[Lex]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

I thought everybody knew that Judi James talks bollocks most of the time?Who even listens to her?lol

This! ...besides, some people seem to think that she is some sort of psycho analyst or something...when really she is merely a so called 'body-language expert' and in fact has no scientifically recognised qualifications at all!
In other words...she is about as qualified to read peoples real nature and intentions as the 'Gypsy Rosalee's' that are parked in every other shop front on Blackpool Promenade!...And yes , she did sound as though she was being sexist last night...[and probably was!]...but worse than that is the fact that she sits up confidently and speaks in a manner that exudes superiority and sophistication ...but yet continuously spouts rubbish, and peddling her transparently biased views of the house mates...aided by Emma Willis whom she obviously has some kind of Svengali hold over, which makes her fawn over her like a modern day prophet! [wonder if she's Emma's mother?]

In short, as Eyeballpaul says...Judi James is no more than a wannabe-shrink that spouts copious amounts of Shyte ! ....just ignore her...she's...

[Arrow]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

Can you read or do you deliberately choose not to? Please point out all the allegations I make.

Do you read your own posts you made the allegations that its a fact he is sexist chauvinist