Quote:
Originally Posted by GiRTh
What are you on about? What allegations have I made? If you want a dialogue then please note what I say and make your response relevant.
Let me explain, I have made no allegation but I have heard a hell of a lot of stories and read a hell of a lot of articles in the paper with a very conservative estimate of half of those being true - then I have a great idea of what Jim Davidson is like plus his persona on screen is consistent with what I've read. I met him once in the 1980 and his persona was consistent then too.
There is no need to reply cuz I dont think you really have anything to say. I dont have proof , I dont ne4ed it this is not a court of law but I've heard a hell of a lot of thing s and I've read a hell of a lot of things and what I see on Tv is consistent with that. I dont need any more than that to state my opinion
Do you wish to discuss the other part of my post or are you gonnas skate over that bit?
|
so youre making endless assumptions and labelling jim depsite knowing nothing of the specifics and depsite the fact no charges were ever made. pretty judgemental that. as for judy james not only is she anti jim , but she is openly biased for the women, the term we could have won the battle is a disgrace for a supposedly professional obective analyst
Threaded Mode