[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by kefln

Yes, the "supposed" Helen warnings could be wrong, it could be more, it could be less.

But there is only one that counts. The formal one.

And its extremely funny to read peoples opinions on this. Denying that Helen has had so many warnings, despite having ex-HM's talk about it, but then have the same people demand to know why Ashleigh didn't get a warning.

Maybe she did. Maybe she didn't. Maybe the context, the nature and the character of the individual is whats taken into account before warnings are given out.

We've all have seen Helen's outbursts, its wrong to defend them by pointing the finger at another HM and cry foul.

With respect however, we should and can only go on what we see,it is up to BB to show us the warnings when given and they haven't shown us Ashleigh getting one.
I stand by what I see,not from what others say or want to be the case.Nothing can operate properly like that.

It is undeniable, 2 threats were made to other housemates,not to their faces but both made in anger and likely frustration too.
Helen as to Ashleigh and smashing her face in, then also Ashleigh in a same scenario of anger and frustration as to Christopher, re- smashing his face into a mirror.

Now if one deserves a warning,then so does the other on balance I say, we know one has been given, we have no idea as yet if a warning was given for the other incident.
Until that is confirmed, then we are right to assume she didn't get one while Helen did.
As warnings are usually eventually shown to the viewers.

It isn't about praising one and running the other down,I have said on here Helen fully deserved her warning for it,that you cannot go around threatening people,however I equally believe Ashleigh deserves one for her incident too.