[kefln]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

With respect however, we should and can only go on what we see,it is up to BB to show us the warnings when given and they haven't shown us Ashleigh getting one.

I stand by what I see,not from waht others say or wnat to be the case.Nothing can operate properly like that.

It is undeniable, 2 threats were made to other housemates,not to theri faces but both made in anger and likely frustration too.

Helen as to Ashleigh and smashing her face in, then also Ashleigh in a same scenario of anger and frustration as to Christopher, re- smashing his face into a mirror.

Now if one deserves a warning,then so does the other on balnce I say, we know one has been given, we have no idea as yet if a warning was given for the other incident.
Until that is confirmed, then we are right to assume she didn't get one while Helen did.
As warnings are usually eventually shown to the viewers.

It isn't about praising one and running the other down,I have said on here Helen fully deserved her warning for it,that you cannot go around threatening people,however I equally believe Ashleigh deserves one for her incident too.

And that is your right.

However, Helen has received a formal warning for bad behaviour. She was told by BB that she was being monitored and further action would be taken if something similar happens again. Fast forward a few weeks and Helen makes a statement about smashing someones face in. BB has no choice but to call her up on it.

A person on probation can not be compared to a person with no prior history.