[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Nedusa

My point exactly, there was no need for a trial as no crime had been reported by anybody , nor was there any evidence of any crime. In fact it appears a crime was concocted to fit the situation , sold to the complainant and then persued by the authorities .

Strangest court case I have come across in years.




.

..I don't get that though Nedusa because she did phone the police as soon as she woke up in the hotel room and couldn't remember going there etc...I don't think that she reported rape as such because that's the point and why consent was doubtful..she had no recollection of any of it so how could she have consented..?..that's not me btw saying that but what the court findings were with Chad and the reason it was different with McDonald is that she had approached him so consent was possible../element of doubt...


..also this case is more complicated as opposed to someone who may have accused someone of rape because they had regrets about something for the very reason that she didn't make any rape accusations when she called the police...their investigations led to that, surely..?...